I've also added a roadmap to show the order in which new features will
be available. Again: comments are invited.
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 14:47 -0700, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> In preparation for a beta release of the package manager, I've created a
> tutorial. I hope you find it useful. Comments an
Hello Blake,
Please present at least one use case where box/unbox behavior differs
from ⊂/⊃ behavior. For all the use cases you present in your email, I
do not believe there is a difference.
Regards,
Fred Pitts
Retired Chemical Engineer
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 09:00 -0500, Blake McBride
In preparation for a beta release of the package manager, I've created a
tutorial. I hope you find it useful. Comments and corrections are
invited.
There are a few more things that I'd like to fix before declaring this
ready for testing, but you're welcome to take a look now.
https://github.com/T
According to the IBM reference, quad-FX should change the definition of
a function in the workspace even when the function is pendent.
A related mutation that'd be interesting (to me, at least) would be an
APL that only allowed definitions in the form of Dyalog's direct
definitions (d-fns). This would include all of the associated
mechanisms, like lexical scoping and guards. Maybe even closures...
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:28 +020
Thanks!
Now, I need to be able to pass an initialisation argument, as well as a way
to specify the location of the library. Any suggestion how to do this?
As for the init parameter, I'm now passing it into the native function
(it's a single number that specifies the port number to listen to, or -
Hi Elias,
I have changed the code so that libemacs is loaded automatically
when GNU APL is started with --emacs. SVN 269.
I believe that other libraries shall unload themselves on )CLEAR,
at least that is what I would expect.
/// Jürgen
Thanks, Jürgen.
I'm comfortable with this resolution.
I noticed the same typos on p. 110 of the ISO spec. It didn't occur to
me, though, to substitute Z←(R) ≠ (R).
Best wishes,
David
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 16:40 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> not sure if it contradicts.
>
>
Hi David,
not sure if it contradicts.
(1) First of all the ISO standard says this about *A f¨ B* and *f¨ B:*
*9.2.6 Each*
...
For both forms:
If B is not empty, Signal domain-error.
...
I believe this is a typo and they mean "if B is empty". Thus according
to the ISO standard +¨'' is undef
