On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 06:06:58PM -0700, cody wrote:
> would brltty be able to work with say x windows? something like fluxbox or
> something?
It works with Gnome and Orca, but I am not aware of any simpler environments
under X in which BRLTTY is supported.
___
just curious...not that I'd ever need it for a simple window
manager..console is faster.
s waI - Original Message -
From: "Jason White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: [BRLTTY] access to a simple window manager
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 06:
For completeness, I'll mention that progress is being made toward enabling QT
and, especially, KDE applications to support accessibility APIs as well.
TrollTech announced just such an API recently, based on the Gnome
Accessibility API, but which relies on DBus to interact with the assistive
techno
[quoted lines by Lee Maschmeyer on 2007/08/24 at 09:28 -0400]
Hi:
>Very much to my surprise, Caledonia should use the e-d sign:
The problem is a rule in the table which says that "ed" in the middle of a
word, when followed by "o", shoudn't be contracted. This certanly looks like a
flawed rule, b
Hi
I can see now it's a USB problem from the debug log. I wondered about the tcl
error, this should not cause this problem they are two separate issues, right?
Could you please include the brltty.conf lines so that we can be assured that
they're specified correctly?
# This is a configuration
[quoted lines by Georgina Joyce on 2007/08/25 at 15:54 +0100]
>I can see now it's a USB problem from the debug log.
>I wondered about the tcl error, this should not cause this problem they are
>two separate issues, right?
Yes, you're correct, and, by the way, that problem is fixed in the lates
-0014 | Ottawa, Ontario | Word of God. Please contact me
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Canada K2A 1H7 | if you're concerned about Hell.
http://FamilyRadio.com/ | http://Mielke.cc/bible/
___
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing l
[quoted lines by Georgina Joyce on 2007/08/25 at 22:06 +0100]
>Well it don't look good!
Well ... maybe it looks better than you think.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/bus/usb# ls -1
>1
>2
>3
>4
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/bus/usb#
The bus numbers are there. It's just that they don't have leading zeros like
[quoted lines by Dave Mielke on 2007/08/25 at 17:28 -0400]
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/bus/usb# ls -1
>>1
>>2
>>3
>>4
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/bus/usb#
>
>The bus numbers are there. It's just that they don't have leading zeros like
>they usually do and like brltty is expecting them to have. We should
