Yep, that did it, thanks so much.
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> ahhh you are probably correct, I will check that out and see what
> happens -- Thanks so much for sticking with me.
>
> Dave Mielke wrote:
>
> > [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/06 at 08:18 -0500]
> >
> > >I aga
ahhh you are probably correct, I will check that out and see what
happens -- Thanks so much for sticking with me.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/06 at 08:18 -0500]
>
> >I again dumped a file after typing all 8 dots, that is what I did. So I
> >really don
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/06 at 08:18 -0500]
>I again dumped a file after typing all 8 dots, that is what I did. So I
>really don't know what is on the screen except a question mark, just
>what is in the files.
Now that I know you're using hexdump to see what the characte
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 23:45 -0500]
>
> >I did a hexdump of the file to get the character. What is in my file
> >wit the section sign is actually a7c2 -- all characters seem to be two
> >bytes.
>
> a7c2 (which really should be read c2a7 si
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 23:45 -0500]
>I did a hexdump of the file to get the character. What is in my file
>wit the section sign is actually a7c2 -- all characters seem to be two
>bytes.
a7c2 (which really should be read c2a7 since Intel/AMD processors are little
I did a hexdump of the file to get the character. What is in my file
wit the section sign is actually a7c2 -- all characters seem to be two
bytes.
I do have unicode=yes in my /etc/rc.conf, so it is supported for
keyboards and screens.
But I have had this all along and its something different about
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 20:59 -0500]
>The character I get is 0x8bc3, whereas before it was that section sign
>and it put up all 8 dots -- it is possible I was using a different text
>table, I can't find out now, however.
How are you determining that the character
Any documentation?
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 17:09 -0500]
>
> >OK, sounds interesting. I have never used it, so what languages can
> >you use with it? Could you use perl or something simple?
>
> BrlAPI bindings have currently been implement
The character I get is 0x8bc3, whereas before it was that section sign
and it put up all 8 dots -- it is possible I was using a different text
table, I can't find out now, however.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 18:11 -0500]
>
> >But what I am tryi
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 17:09 -0500]
>OK, sounds interesting. I have never used it, so what languages can
>you use with it? Could you use perl or something simple?
BrlAPI bindings have currently been implemented in C, Java, Lisp, Python, and
TCL.
--
Dave Miel
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 18:11 -0500]
>But what I am trying to say, my screen font has not changed, and in 4.5
>I got all 8 dots up when typing that character -- I was typing all 8
>dots on the keyboard, but now when I tyhpe all 8 dots, I am getting a
>very different
But what I am trying to say, my screen font has not changed, and in 4.5
I got all 8 dots up when typing that character -- I was typing all 8
dots on the keyboard, but now when I tyhpe all 8 dots, I am getting a
very different character which comes out as a question mark.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [qu
OK, sounds interesting. I have never used it, so what languages can
you use with it? Could you use perl or something simple?
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 14:23 -0500]
>
> >I have the section character (40 of them in a file), for testing the
> >
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 14:23 -0500]
>I have the section character (40 of them in a file), for testing the
>Braille display and bringing all dots up.\
A BrlAPI client could be written to do that.
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible is the ver
Anyway to get brltty to display the character correctly -- at least for
this one?
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:34 -0500]
>
> >hmmm, if I type all 8 dots, it comes out a question mark instead of all
> >8 dots -- what am I doing wrong?
>
> Proba
I have the section character (40 of them in a file), for testing the
Braille display and bringing all dots up.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:21 -0500]
>
> >OK, I will try to change the character, maybe that would be easier than
> >to find where
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:34 -0500]
>hmmm, if I type all 8 dots, it comes out a question mark instead of all
>8 dots -- what am I doing wrong?
Probably nothing. By pressing all eight dots, you're entering the desired
character. The system then tries to display th
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:21 -0500]
>OK, I will try to change the character, maybe that would be easier than
>to find where the one I have is located.
When you say the character you have, what do you mean?
--
Dave Mielke | 2213 Fox Crescent | The Bible
If I type all 8 dots, I get 8bc3 in hex.
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> hmmm, if I type all 8 dots, it comes out a question mark instead of all
> 8 dots -- what am I doing wrong?
>
> Dave Mielke wrote:
>
> > [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:00 -0500]
> >
> > >My tabl
It was a different version of brltty as well.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:00 -0500]
> >My character seems to be a unicode a7c2, but I can only find it in
> >/etc/brltty/zh-tw.ctb:always and it does not have the dots I am seeing.
> >What I am se
hmmm, if I type all 8 dots, it comes out a question mark instead of all
8 dots -- what am I doing wrong?
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:00 -0500]
>
> >My table is en-naccb.ttb.
>
> In the en-nabcc text table, the only character represented by al
OK, I will try to change the character, maybe that would be easier than
to find where the one I have is located.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:00 -0500]
>
> >My table is en-naccb.ttb.
>
> In the en-nabcc text table, the only character represent
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:00 -0500]
>My character seems to be a unicode a7c2, but I can only find it in
>/etc/brltty/zh-tw.ctb:always and it does not have the dots I am seeing.
>What I am seeing is just for a7, but changing it does not change what I
>am seeing.
A7C
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/05 at 01:00 -0500]
>My table is en-naccb.ttb.
In the en-nabcc text table, the only character represented by all eight dots is
a capital letter E with a diaeresis accent (two dots above it). You may know
this accent by its name in another languag
My table is en-naccb.ttb.
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/04 at 19:33 -0500]
>
> >I have a strange problem -- I am not sure when this started, but
> >definitely in the 5.0 series. There used to be a symbol by which I
> >could get all 8 dots -- my speech
Hi. My character seems to be a unicode a7c2, but I can only find it in
/etc/brltty/zh-tw.ctb:always and it does not have the dots I am seeing.
What I am seeing is just for a7, but changing it does not change what I
am seeing.
What am I missing?
Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by cov...@ccs.
[quoted lines by cov...@ccs.covici.com on 2014/03/04 at 19:33 -0500]
>I have a strange problem -- I am not sure when this started, but
>definitely in the 5.0 series. There used to be a symbol by which I
>could get all 8 dots -- my speech recognized it as section, but now the
>character is transl
27 matches
Mail list logo
