Re: [BRLTTY] The Baum driver should *NOT* claim a TSI display!

2007-08-26 Thread Dave Mielke
[quoted lines by Jason White on 2007/08/27 at 10:15 +1000] >Am I correct, however, in assuming that the problem only arises with a serial >interface? And, I suspect, with Bluetooth. >Under USB, the vendor/product ids should be sufficient to distinguish a Baum >display from a PowerBraille, Yes.

Re: [BRLTTY] The Baum driver should *NOT* claim a TSI display!

2007-08-26 Thread Jason White
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 02:20:10PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > One other alternative would be to introduce a braille driver parameter > to enable compatibility to other display types in the Baum driver, and set it > to off by default. This way, a user that is using the compatibility modes > of a

Re: [BRLTTY] The Baum driver should *NOT* claim a TSI display!

2007-08-26 Thread Mario Lang
Jason White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Does the Baum driver really have to claim a 80 cell PowerBraille? > > I think this is a bug that should be fixed. Perhaps the Baum driver should > skip checking for TSI and Handytech protocols if the display is connected via > a serial interface and the m

Re: [BRLTTY] The Baum driver should *NOT* claim a TSI display!

2007-08-26 Thread Jason White
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:16:32AM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > Does the Baum driver really have to claim a 80 cell PowerBraille? I think this is a bug that should be fixed. Perhaps the Baum driver should skip checking for TSI and Handytech protocols if the display is connected via a serial interf

[BRLTTY] The Baum driver should *NOT* claim a TSI display!

2007-08-26 Thread Mario Lang
Hi. I remember we've discussed this several months ago already, but now that I am trying brltty 3.8 on one maschine of mine that uses a TSI PowerBraille 80, I have seen this bug again. When I disconnect my TSI and reconnect it later on, it can happen that the Baum driver claims the display in Pow