Jason White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Does the Baum driver really have to claim a 80 cell PowerBraille? > > I think this is a bug that should be fixed. Perhaps the Baum driver should > skip checking for TSI and Handytech protocols if the display is connected via > a serial interface and the manufacturer is being auto-detected.
One other alternative would be to introduce a braille driver parameter to enable compatibility to other display types in the Baum driver, and set it to off by default. This way, a user that is using the compatibility modes of a Vario could enable this easily in his/her config file, and the other users would be protected from false-positives by default. >> AFAIR, the compatibility mode is for the Vario 40 models, >> that display only has 40 cells by default. Can we perhaps >> make the baum driver ignore 80 cell TSI displays at least? > > I'm sure that 80-cell SuperVario displays have PowerBraille protocol support > as well, so this isn't the right solution. Yes, after I sent the mail I remembered that I was once using a Vario 80 which also had the compatibility modes. -- CYa, Mario | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/> _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty