Re: [Boost-cmake] Options to only Build A single Library

Hi Mike, On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have updated to the latest Boost-Cmake from the SVN repository and ran > CMake to configure my build. I thought there used to be an option for each > library as to whether it would be built or not. Has this opti

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to start contributing to the Boost-CMake integration effort but > I would like some help determining where to "jump in". Looking at the list > it seems like some

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Doug Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Mike Jackson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to start contributing to the Boost-CMake integration effort > but > > I would like some help determining where to "jump in". Looking

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That argues for merging into the trunk sooner rather than later. OTOH, if > there isn't any new build system documentation and/or the new build system > is unstable, then merging will cause frustration and start things off o

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That argues for merging into the trunk sooner rather than later. OTOH, if there isn't any new build system documentation and/or the new build system is unstable, then me

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Doug Gregor wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> That argues for merging into the trunk sooner rather than later. OTOH, if >>> there

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:17 PM, David Abrahams wrote: on Wed Oct 29 2008, "Doug Gregor" wrote: I added some debugging into the BoostCore.cmake modularization code

[Boost-cmake] Testing Setup

I am working through the "testing" part of the build system at this point and I have some questions about how the typical boost developer actually runs the "tests". The tests are compiled using the build/source tree. Is it probable that boost developers actually install boost then try and c

Re: [Boost-cmake] Current Dependency Graph

on Fri Oct 31 2008, Mike Jackson wrote: > Wiki Might be a better place for this, Definitely. > but I'll get it out this way for now. Doesn't look quite right; IIUC there are circular dependencies between mpl and type_traits. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _

Re: [Boost-cmake] Testing Setup

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I am working through the "testing" part of the build system at this point > and I have some questions about how the typical boost developer actually > runs the "tests". > > The tests are compiled using the build/source tree

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:14 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Michael Jackson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:17 PM, David Abrahams wrote: >>> on Wed O

Re: [Boost-cmake] Testing Setup

On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I am working through the "testing" part of the build system at this point and I have some questions about how the typical boost developer actually runs the "tests".

Re: [Boost-cmake] Current Dependency Graph

On Oct 31, 2008, at 1:21 PM, David Abrahams wrote: on Fri Oct 31 2008, Mike Jackson wrote: Wiki Might be a better place for this, Definitely. but I'll get it out this way for now. Doesn't look quite right; IIUC there are circular dependencies between mpl and type_traits. -- Dave A

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in the "boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ? Yeah, that's how I would do it. So are talking about modularizing what is left into "libs/core" then?

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: > > > What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in the > "boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ? Yeah,

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That argues for merging into the trunk sooner rather than later. OTOH, if there isn't any new build system documentation and/or the new build system is unstable, then me

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Doug Gregor wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> That argues for merging into the trunk sooner rather than later. OTOH, if >>> there

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in the "boost" directory. Are those going to be the

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Michael Jackson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: >>> >>> >>> What I am n

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So should I be committing what I have to the trunk. Yes, please. I can put some cmake code in the top level CMakeLists.txt file that will abort the cmake run unless a

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Oct 31, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor

Re: [Boost-cmake] Want to help but need to prioritize TODO list

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Michael Jackson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Doug Gregor wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Michael Jackson >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> So should I be committing what I have to the trunk. >>> >> >> Yes, please. >> >>

Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Michael Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > macro(boost_test_add_dependent_includes includes) > foreach (include ${includes}) >#message(STATUS "include: ${include}") >include_directories("${Boost_SOURCE_DIR}/libs/${include}/include") > endforeach (include