On Oct 31, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:


What I am not sure of is what to do with the remaining headers in the
"boost" directory. Are those going to be the "core" of Boost or ?

Yeah, that's how I would do it.

So are talking about modularizing what is left into "libs/core" then? I just
want to be really clear and certain before I make that move.

Sorry, I was very unclear. I would like the remaining libs (mpl,
type_traits, config, and whatever else is in that tangle)
unmodularized for now. There *are* circular dependencies at the
library level and they aren't trivial to untangle. It's better for the
CMake effort to leave those in the non-modularized core and let the
library authors sort out the dependencies later.


How my working directory stands now is that all the libraries are modularized.

The problem I know have is that according to the generated dependency graph there is only 1 circular between date_time, algorithm and regex.

MPL, Type_Traits and such _seem_ to be ok but I think that is probably a false report going on what you guys are telling me.

_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            www.bluequartz.net

_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake

Reply via email to