Re: [Boost-cmake] What we're doing testing-wise (was Status and future of boost-cmake)

2008-07-03 Thread David Abrahams
Evan Wheeler wrote: > David Abrahams wrote: >> troy d. straszheim wrote: >> >> >>> The dashboardish trac plugin is slow (for various fixable reasons) and >>> needs more features (it only has a couple of views), but it is easy to >>> extend and I already find it useful. I think it won't be long b

Re: [Boost-cmake] What we're doing testing-wise (was Status and future of boost-cmake)

2008-07-02 Thread Evan Wheeler
David Abrahams wrote: troy d. straszheim wrote: The dashboardish trac plugin is slow (for various fixable reasons) and needs more features (it only has a couple of views), but it is easy to extend and I already find it useful. I think it won't be long before we are more effective at communi

Re: [Boost-cmake] What we're doing testing-wise (was Status and future of boost-cmake)

2008-07-02 Thread David Abrahams
troy d. straszheim wrote: > The dashboardish trac plugin is slow (for various fixable reasons) and > needs more features (it only has a couple of views), but it is easy to > extend and I already find it useful. I think it won't be long before we > are more effective at communicating the current s

[Boost-cmake] What we're doing testing-wise (was Status and future of boost-cmake)

2008-07-02 Thread troy d. straszheim
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: - Is there a CDash dashboard actively running? It seems that the http://dart.resophonic.com/boost_1_34_0/Dashboard has been down for the last 4 days at least... Troy's been working on an updated system that isn't based on CDash. I haven't been keeping up with