Evan Wheeler wrote: > David Abrahams wrote: >> troy d. straszheim wrote: >> >> >>> The dashboardish trac plugin is slow (for various fixable reasons) and >>> needs more features (it only has a couple of views), but it is easy to >>> extend and I already find it useful. I think it won't be long before we >>> are more effective at communicating the current state of the release >>> branch than the current testing system is, even with far fewer people >>> and machines. I expect this to be a big help making our case. >>> >> >> IMO speeding this thing up and improving the usefulness of the feedback >> has to be made a much higher priority. Currently it's so painful for me >> to look at any results that I just don't bother. >> >> >> > Agreed. Troy and I knew that the current interface wasn't going to be > the final product. I started working on a new interface a few weeks > back but then got swamped with day-job deadlines. I just finished all > that up today actually, so I should be able to make some good progress > on the trac interface in the next couple weeks.
Very cool. I'm looking forward to that! -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
