On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 00:11 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote:
> Personally, I don't like the "register" approach, but I do like good
> ways of gathering helpful information that isn't available elsewhere. We
> can be sure that the structure of people using OOo/LibO isn't identical
> to those we get dir
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 14:58 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> anyone has insight on how that is usually handled? I am aware of the two
> Chinese character types, but don't know how that works in practical
> terms. :-)
Simplified and Traditional scripts. Where the major territory us
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 11:08 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Last call: are we good on this?
Just on the member application process. Why not just leave it as
"
An applicant preferably should be nominated by an existing Member.
The applicant should have earned a good reputation among the exist
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:21 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> So - do people have problems with any of that ?
Proposed changes look uncontentious to me.
C.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:51 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> 1) approve that people listed at
> http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/ are current members
> of TDF according to our ByLaws
Yes
> 2) approve Fridrich Strba as member of TDF
Yes.
C.
--
Unsubscribe instruct
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 20:57 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> unavailable for some time. To avoid the membership committee being
> unable to work during this time, Cor Nouws should serve as her deputy,
> taking over her responsibility during her time of absence.
>
> A 2/3 majority out of the e
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 11:38 +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > As described in the last confcall minutes, I would like to call for a formal
> > approval from the SC on considering a yet undefined online component for
> > LibreOffice as a strategic option. This would not o
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 15:58 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
> according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
> to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon
> Foundation time.
Le
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 12:47 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> The logos that bear the exact mention of
> the software name with the mention "The Document Foundation" are
> reserved for two purposes:
>
> * the sole and official use of TDF as an entity, for instance on splash
> screens from sof
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 18:43 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Caolan,
>
> I think we got that covered already in the text... Or am I wrong?
I thought it was such that the default logos (with TDF on it) could be
used under the "substantially unchanged" concept. But on re-reading, it
reads more lik
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:25 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andre Schnabel wrote on 2011-08-08 13:17:
> > ... our default logos in the source tree use the TDF tagline (at least this
> > was when I last did a build from source), but the tagged logo should
> > be used for "instance on ..
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 14:31 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Caolan McNamara wrote:
> > > > Imho quite easy to resolve: use the community logos per default for
> > > > builds
> > > > from source. Enable the Logo with TDF tagline on build time and tell
>
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 23:54 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > "Screenshots for documentation, website and marketing should
> > preferably be taken on GNU/Linux, but may also be taken on any other
> > operating system.
> >
> > The Steering Committee recommends a consis
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:41 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> So I'd love the board to vote to approve (if
> I got it right, and the existing MC are generally happy) on:
>
> Members: (5)
> Andre Schnabel
> Fridrich Strba
> Norbert Thiebaud
> Simon Phipps
> Sophie Gautier
14 matches
Mail list logo
