Re: [steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-07 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi André, André Schnabel wrote on 2011-07-04 20.16: > A rough draft for a time line might look like this: thanks a lot for your work on this - this looks very good to me, indeed! Florian -- Florian Effenberger Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 996

Re: [steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-07 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 7/4/11 8:16 PM, André Schnabel wrote: According to our bylaws we have only one fixed period to consider: we need to announce the elections 45 days in advance. But I think, we need to have some more milestones in the process. I agree with the timeline, and we should announce it as soon as we

Re: [steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-06 Thread sophie
On 04/07/2011 21:16, André Schnabel wrote: Hi, as the SC is obligated to end it's existence, we need to think about BoD elections. ah, it's a pleasure :) According to our bylaws we have only one fixed period to consider: we need to announce the elections 45 days in advance. But I think, we ne

Re: [steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-06 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hi, 2011/7/6 Thorsten Behrens > André Schnabel wrote: > > so - no comments or objections means, that the draft is just to good > > to be changed? ;) > > > Quite - let's go with it. :) > +1 Charles. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting

Re: [steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-06 Thread Thorsten Behrens
André Schnabel wrote: > so - no comments or objections means, that the draft is just to good > to be changed? ;) > Quite - let's go with it. :) Cheers, -- Thorsten -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documen

Re: [steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-05 Thread André Schnabel
Hi, so - no comments or objections means, that the draft is just to good to be changed? ;) If yes, I'd like to have a vote on this in the next SC meeting. regards, André Am 04.07.2011 20:16, schrieb André Schnabel: Hi, as the SC is obligated to end it's existence, we need to think about B

[steering-discuss] draft: timeline for BoD elections

2011-07-04 Thread André Schnabel
Hi, as the SC is obligated to end it's existence, we need to think about BoD elections. According to our bylaws we have only one fixed period to consider: we need to announce the elections 45 days in advance. But I think, we need to have some more milestones in the process. A rough draft for a t