On 6/6/11 8:07 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Michael Meeks a écrit :
100% agreed. I'm eager to vote in support of / on our SC -
since it seems some criticise them for being un-elected :-) Nice to
knock down all the objections one by one of course.
+1
+1
--
Italo Vignoli - The Do
Le Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:52:17 +0100,
Michael Meeks a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:41 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > Until then it is pretty much vaporware and there is not much to do,
> > even less to vote about.
>
> 100% agreed. I'm eager to vote in support of / on our SC -
>
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:41 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Until then it is pretty much vaporware and there is not much to do,
> even less to vote about.
100% agreed. I'm eager to vote in support of / on our SC - since it
seems some criticise them for being un-elected :-) Nice to knock
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: sophie
>> To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
>> Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 12:35:04
>> Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>> On 06/06/2011 14:20, Tom Davies wrote:
>>
Hi Marc,
So ! thanks for your awesome work around the 3.4features page - very
much appreciated.
Since you're clearly so effective in making our webpages look pretty, I
was wondering ...
Is there any chance you could help fix / improve our donations page ?
first - IMHO we
Hi Tom,
On 06/06/2011 14:20, Tom Davies wrote:
[...]
Hi :)
Agreed. But the founders have shown good strategic planning and good planning
for the future as shown by the way things have played out in the last few
weeks. I think it would take time for newly elected people to have such
commitment
- Original Message
> From: sophie
> To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 12:10:30
> Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
>
> Hi Volker, all,
> On 06/06/2011 13:02, Volker Merschmann wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I'd like to add that not every co
Hi Volker, all,
On 06/06/2011 13:02, Volker Merschmann wrote:
[...]
I'd like to add that not every contributor wants to be a member of the
foundation. Especially those who are payed for the work might not like
to have a too personal connection.
We can ask the membership committee if there is a
- Original Message
> From: Volker Merschmann
> To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Sent: Mon, 6 June, 2011 11:02:56
> Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] About elections
>
> Hi,
>
> 2011/6/6 Florian Effenberger :
> > Tom Davies wrote on 2011-06-06 11.22:
> >>
> >> I think 100
Hi,
2011/6/6 Florian Effenberger :
> Tom Davies wrote on 2011-06-06 11.22:
>>
>> I think 100 is still quite small compared to the numbers of people
>> actually
>> involved. So the list of members is still more like a special-interest
>> sub-set. The founder members are doing a great job and i ho
Hi Tom,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-06-06 11.22:
I think 100 is still quite small compared to the numbers of people actually
involved. So the list of members is still more like a special-interest
sub-set. The founder members are doing a great job and i hope that they stay in
place for a long whil
Hi :)
I think 100 is still quite small compared to the numbers of people actually
involved. So the list of members is still more like a special-interest
sub-set. The founder members are doing a great job and i hope that they stay
in
place for a long while yet.
Regards from
Tom :)
- Or
Hello everyone,
given that the Foundation is close to being created, and that we have
now nearly 100 approved members (thanks to the membership committee for
their great work!), I guess that in the near future we should think
about holding elections for the future board of directors. IIRC, all
13 matches
Mail list logo
