Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support font-variation-settings descriptor in @font-face rule

LGTM1, I'm happy to see this ship too. I took a look at all tests with font-variation-settings in the path, and see that calc-in-font-variation-settings.html

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: highlightsFromPoint API

LGTM1 On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 11:19 AM 'Fernando Fiori' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reactivating this thread after some updates addressing feedback > received here: > > - highlightsFromPoint now also returns the ranges hit for each Highlight > under a given point a

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: highlightsFromPoint API

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2025-07-09 17:09, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 11:19 AM 'Fernando Fiori' via blink-dev wrote: Hi, I'm reactivating this thread after some updates addressing feedback received here: - highlightsFromPoint now also returns the ranges h

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: highlightsFromPoint API

LGTM3 On Wednesday, July 9, 2025 at 11:10:37 AM UTC-4 Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2025-07-09 17:09, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 11:19 AM 'Fernando Fiori' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm reactivating this thread

Re: [blink-dev] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Intent to Ship: Support width and height as presentation attributes on nested elements

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 1:21 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks for working on these!! > > +Vladimir Levin +Chris Harrelson > - what would it take to add these to the CSSWG > agenda? (and maybe get eyes on the WPT review) > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/iss

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS find-in-page highlight pseudos

Contact emails schen...@chromium.org, ji...@igalia.com Explainer https://github.com/Igalia/explainers/blob/main/css/find-in-page/README.md Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo-4/#selectordef-search-text Design docs https://github.com/Igalia/explainers/blob/main/css/find-in-page/

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation: UX Refresh

Sorry, I didn't read the WPT PRs you linked. I see that the tests already depend on test_driver.add_virtual_authenticator(). Is there anything blocking testing here, or is it OK if shipping this is conditional on the tests being landed? On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 5:17 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > H

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support font-variation-settings descriptor in @font-face rule

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2025-07-09 17:23, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2, with one note below. On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:07 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, I'm happy to see this ship too. I took a look at all tests with font-variation-settings in the

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation: UX Refresh

Hey, with regards to providing logos. My understanding is that this would be displayed in a trusted content. Is there some affordances to clearly indicate that these logos are provided by the merchants? I'm a little concerned for cases like displaying arbitrary content in trusted UI because of

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Extend Experiment: Playout Statistics API for WebAudio

LGTM to extend to 142 inclusive On Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 8:47:42 AM UTC-4 Chromestatus wrote: > Contact emails fhernqv...@google.com, o...@google.com, hongc...@google.com, > agpa...@google.com, gui...@google.com > > Explainer https://github.com/WICG/web_audio_playout > > Specification https

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation: UX Refresh

> Hey, with regards to providing logos. My understanding is that this would be displayed in a trusted content. Is there some affordances to clearly indicate that these logos are provided by the merchants? I'm a little concerned for cases like displaying arbitrary content in trusted UI because of th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support font-variation-settings descriptor in @font-face rule

LGTM2, with one note below. On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:07 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM1, I'm happy to see this ship too. > > I took a look at all tests with font-variation-settings in the > > path,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation: UX Refresh

Hey Stephen, Is WebAuthn virtual authenticators the DevTools feature mentioned in https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools/webauthn? If you need powerful test automation for WebAuthn, have you had a look at what's currently possible with WebDriver BiDi and testdriver.js? Recently

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: SwiftShader Fallback

An update: We added an enterprise policy that allows users to re-enable Swiftshader. This should help with the managed VM / remote desktop use-case. In Chrome 139, we will start experimenting (via Finch/partial deployments) wi

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation: UX Refresh

> Sorry, I didn't read the WPT PRs you linked. I see that the tests already depend on test_driver.add_virtual_authenticator(). Is there anything blocking testing here, or is it OK if shipping this is conditional on the tests being landed? The main issue is that WebAuthn virtual authenticators are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Script Tools API

Thanks! Filled these out in chromestatus - posting inline replies below as well. On Wednesday, July 9, 2025 at 1:48:42 PM UTC-4 Reilly Grant wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:36 AM David Bokan wrote: Contact emailsbo...@chromium.org, hvanops...@chromium.org, khushalsagar@ chromium.org Explainer

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

Contact emails y...@google.com, ev...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/WebAudio/web-speech-api/blob/main/explainers/contextual-biasing.md Specification https://webaudio.github.io/web-speech-api/#speechreco-phraselist Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AW9DxKYNfnt_wruxmd-_

Re: [EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API contextual biasing

> Design docs > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AW9DxKYNfnt_wruxmd-_M1islS-MgsUVpaNBen-XvHk I don’t have access to this document. Could it be made available to non-Googlers? > TAG review > None Can you say why no TAG review? > Gecko: Positive (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Script Tools API

Contact emailsbo...@chromium.org, hvanops...@chromium.org, khushalsa...@chromium.org ExplainerNone - We're working to publish an explainer ASAP and will link it on this thread when it's available. SpecificationNone Summary Script Tools enable authors to expose JavaScript APIs on their site for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Script Tools API

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 9:36 AM David Bokan wrote: > Contact emailsbo...@chromium.org, hvanops...@chromium.org, > khushalsa...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone - We're working to publish an explainer ASAP and will link > it on this thread when it's available. > > SpecificationNone > > Summary > > Sc

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support font-variation-settings descriptor in @font-face rule

Thank you all for your approvals. @Chris Harrelson - have updated the signal. @Philip Jägenstedt - After investigating the test, I found that it has been failing since last month after a new assert was added in this merge

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support font-variation-settings descriptor in @font-face rule

On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 10:53 AM 'Sejal Anand' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Thank you all for your approvals. > > @Chris Harrelson - have updated the signal. > > @Philip Jägenstedt - After investigating the test, > I found that it has been failing since last month after a