RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Randomizing TCP Port Allocation on Windows

There was no new API here and thus no API detection mechanism. It’s just a bug fix that ensures sockets are not rapidly reused toward the beginning of the available range. Even when the bug is present, most networks work fine; it’s stateful off-device middleboxes that might not see that the con

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Randomizing TCP Port Allocation on Windows

Not to my knowledge, but I'm adding @erik.ander...@microsoft.com in case there is something I missed. I'm fine with starting with 22H2+ only for now, and adding 20H1+ only if there's a reliable way to detect the fix or metrics on fix rollout % that are convincing. ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/Th

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Enable navigator.getInstalledRelatedApps() for desktop web apps

*Contact emails* ishikapa...@microsoft.com luigo...@microsoft.com *Specification* https://wicg.github.io/get-installed-related-apps/spec/#dom-navigator-getinstalledrelatedapps *Design Doc* https://bit.ly/getInstalledRelatedApps *Chrome Status Entry* https://chromestatus.com/feature/56953783095

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Randomizing TCP Port Allocation on Windows

That's probably possible, though hopefully they have installed system updates in the past year. We could just target 2022H2 and later if needed. ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 10:54 AM Jeremy Roman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 12:10 AM Domenic Denicola >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Randomizing TCP Port Allocation on Windows

in general, it's preferable to do a capability test via an OS API rather than simply gate on Windows version. Does the new API that Microsoft added (and backported) provide a way for the OS to signal that this better/working API is available? Will On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 11:15 AM Ari Chivukula w

[blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: ServiceWorker support for Speculation Rules Prefetch

Contact emails hirosh...@chromium.org Specification https://wicg.github.io/nav-speculation/prefetch.html Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/192ZLkKcaUE_9Qt8bW9OZLViEEbtxOAgq5WYR87m79IE/edit?usp=sharing Summary This feature enables ServiceWorker-controlled prefetches, that is a sp

[blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Http cookie prefix

Contact emailsyoavwe...@chromium.org Explainer This will add the cookie name prefix `__Http-`. Cookies that would start with that prefix would only be able to be set using the `Set-Cookie` HTTP header and will have to have an `httpOnly` attribute. Adding that prefix to the cookie name will give s

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Randomizing TCP Port Allocation on Windows

I'm also not sure it needs API Owner approval, but I'll second Domenic: LGTM2 (It does get some extra visibility this way which might be helpful, especially if it triggers some unexpected problems) /Daniel On 2025-06-19 06:10, Domenic Denicola wrote: I believe this should be completely unobs

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Secure Payment Confirmation: Browser Bound Keys

Rick, thanks for taking a look. > >> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests >> >> ?No >> >> Web platform tests depend on the availability of a software >> implementation. Whether software impleme

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Randomizing TCP Port Allocation on Windows

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 12:10 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > I believe this should be completely unobservable to web authors, right? > (Apart from maybe fewer or more network errors.) > > If so, I don't think this needs any LGTMs, as it fits well under the > Web-developer-facing > change to existi

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ScrollIntoView container option

Contact emails fla...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-scrollintoviewoptions-container Summary The ScrollIntoViewOptions container option allows developers to perform a scrollIntoView only scrolling the nearest ancestor scroll container. For