[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-try-fallbacks Summary Replaces the inset-area() function with inset-area values directly within position-try-fallbacks. This means that you now just write e.g. position-try-fa

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Web-Facing Change PSA: Rename position-try-options to position-try-fallbacks

I'll answer since Mason is now OOO. On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:48 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > > On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 12:38:50 AM UTC+2 Mason Freed wrote: > > Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org, andr...@chromium.org > > Specificationhttps://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10395# >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Web-Facing Change PSA: Rename position-try-options to position-try-fallbacks

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:17 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > I'll answer since Mason is now OOO. > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:48 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 12:38:50 AM UTC+2 Mason Freed wrote: >> >> Contact emailsmas...@chro

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Support currentcolor in Relative Color Syntax

Thanks for pushing this! :) Is there a reason this shouldn't be an intent? IIUC, we're exposing a new value here On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:20 PM 'Kevin Babbitt' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > *Contact emails* > > kbabb...@microsoft.com > > *Specification* > > https://www.w3.org/

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position- try-fallbacks Summary Replaces the inset-area() function with inset-area values directly within

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > > Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#positio

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

LGTM1 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:50 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < > yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud >> wrote: >> >> Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org >> >> Exp

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-07-03 13:53, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:50 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 10:47:21 AM UTC+2 Anders Hartvoll Ruud wro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Promise.try

On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 9:23 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 7:25 AM Shu-yu Guo wrote: > >> Contact emails...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> > > I think https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-try/blob/main/README.md > probably qualifies here. > > >> >> Specificationhttp

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

What milestones do you plan to run the experiment in? (Also, why isn't it enough to key on frame origin? I'm sure there is a good reason but it's not obvious.) /Daniel On 2024-07-02 22:42, Kyra Seevers wrote: Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links historyPhase 2

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

LGTM3 On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 7:08 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-07-03 13:53, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 1:50 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:35 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < >> yoavwe...@chromium.org> w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

LGTM1 /Daniel On 2024-06-26 20:16, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: The PR is ready and has been *approved *by the PEWG. The shape of the API has been reverted to an id (albeit with a slight name change, persistentDeviceId) on the main PointerEvent interface. All links along with request

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

LGTM2 Thanks for working through the PR! On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 5:34:54 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM1 > > /Daniel > On 2024-06-26 20:16, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: > > The PR is ready and has been *approved *by the PEWG. > > The shape of the API has been reverted to a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

LGTM3 On 7/3/24 11:35 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM2 Thanks for working through the PR! On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 5:34:54 PM UTC+2 Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 /Daniel On 2024-06-26 20:16, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: The PR is ready and has been *approve

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Promise.try

Thank you for the explanation, Shu-yu. LGTM1. I've filed https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-try/issues/21 about this being stage 3 so that the repo is updated. On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 4:42 PM Shu-yu Guo wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 9:23 PM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

Thank you everyone. Appreciate all your help for each step of the process!! On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 8:50:20 AM UTC-7 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > LGTM3 > On 7/3/24 11:35 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM2 > > Thanks for working through the PR! > > On Wednesday, July 3, 2024 at 5:3

[blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

Dear API owners, We would like to request an extension of the origin trial for Wasm JS String Builtins . There were recent changes to the initialization of string constants (implicit imports) which improved startup time an

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

Update: I wanted to update the thread that WebKit left positive indications of support for this proposal in the request for position recently: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/363. Daniel: Thanks for the question! We will be using a traditional Finch experiment rollout starting

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

One point of clarification: we are intending to experiment for one milestone (M128), but would like to request 3 milestones (M128 - M130) in case of any delays. Thanks so much! On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 2:16 PM Kyra Seevers wrote: > Update: I wanted to update the thread that WebKit left positive >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

LGTM1 (probably 3 needed because this is a non-standard experiment) On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 12:28 PM Kyra Seevers wrote: > One point of clarification: we are intending to experiment for one > milestone (M128), but would like to request 3 milestones (M128 - M130) in > case of any delays. > > Than

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

LGTM2 for a low percentage finch experiment in M128-M130 (inclusive) /Daniel On 2024-07-03 22:02, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 (probably 3 needed because this is a non-standard experiment) On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 12:28 PM Kyra Seevers wrote: One point of clarification: we are intending

Re: [blink-dev] Ready for Developer Testing: Intl.DurationFormat

This was meant to be an Intent to Ship, right? It isn't in that state in ChromeStatus so it doesn't appear on the todo lists right now. Maybe you can navigate it to the right state and get the prerequisite reviews started? /Daniel On 2024-07-02 06:30, Frank Tang wrote: Contact email

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Selection API across Shadow DOM and Selection.getComposedRanges

Contact emailsdizha...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/mfreed7/shadow-dom-selection#readme Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/selection-api Summary The Selection API draft now includes specifications about behaviors when selecting across shadow DOM. https://w3c.github.io/selection-api

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Partitioning :visited links history Phase 2

LGTM3 One question raised elsewhere was around same-origin links, where links to origin B visited from origin A should be then marked as visited when linked directly from B. I see there's an open issue