Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebSocketStream

2024-02-16 Thread Adam Rice
> > Any reason the PR for the spec hasn't landed yet? We don't have interest from a second implementer yet. As far as I know, Deno doesn't count for this purpose. On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 03:50, Chris Harrelson wrote: > Hi, > > Any reason the PR for the spec hasn't landed yet? > > On Thu, Feb 15

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: CSS functions

2024-02-16 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:59:25PM +, Kevin Babbitt wrote: > Is there a tracking bug for this feature? I created one, crbug.com/325504770. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To u

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS picture-in-picture display mode

2024-02-16 Thread Manuel Rego Casasnovas
Thanks for adding the test. LGTM2. Cheers, Rego On 14/02/2024 13:15, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:48 AM Manuel Rego Casasnovas > wrote: On 14/02/2024 10:46, François Beaufort wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 14, 20

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS picture-in-picture display mode

2024-02-16 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM3 On 2/16/24 6:21 AM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: Thanks for adding the test. LGTM2. Cheers,   Rego On 14/02/2024 13:15, 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:48 AM Manuel Rego Casasnovas mailto:r...@igalia.com>> wrote:     On 14/02/2024 10:46, Franço

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shadow root clonable attribute

2024-02-16 Thread Mike Taylor
LGTM1 to ship (see below). On 2/15/24 6:12 PM, Mason Freed wrote: Contact emails mas...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#shadowroot-clonable Summary This enables individual control over whether a shadow root is cl

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: 'priority' HTTP request header

2024-02-16 Thread Patrick Meenan
Contact emailspmee...@google.com ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9218 Summary This feature adds the 'priority' request header for all HTTP requests with the priority information for the request at the time that it was sent. RFC 9218 (Extensible Prioritization Sche

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Zstd Content-Encoding

2024-02-16 Thread Felix Handte
Exciting! Meta supports shipping Zstd. We've been running an experiment on our side and have seen positive user metrics movement from switching to serving zstd to Chrome traffic. On Thursday, February 15, 2024 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-5 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3 > On 2/15/24 1:39 PM, Chris Harrelson w

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: setHTMLUnsafe and parseHTMLUnsafe

2024-02-16 Thread Joey Arhar
> Is this the relevant explainer (referenced from the PR below): https://github.com/WICG/sanitizer-api/blob/main/explainer.md Yes, as far as I know. > This seems positive, right? Whoops, meant to put positive. I updated the chromestatus. > Both of these look like "Shipped/Shipping", per https:/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove "window-placement" alias for permission and permission policy "window-management"

2024-02-16 Thread Brad Triebwasser
Usage for the legacy permission and permission policy are ~0.006 and ~0.015 (% page loads) while the new variants are ~1.166

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shadow root clonable attribute

2024-02-16 Thread Mason Freed
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:30 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 to ship (see below). > Thanks! > It looks like Safari has only shipped to Beta... > Yes, this was a recent consensus/spec, so it hasn't made it all the way to stable yet. > > *Gecko*: Positive (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Mutation Events

2024-02-16 Thread Mason Freed
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 5:39 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > Just thinking about possible use cases for mutation events, do you know > what the browser extension situation is? Those might have legitimate reason > to react to page changes and maybe some of them use the old events? > > That's a good que