I've dropped the experimentation from the feature name.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:36 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> Also, can we please update the chromestatus entry title so "WebGPU
> Subgroups experimentation" is less confusing on
> https://chromestatus.com/roadmap?
> On 1/16/25 9:35 AM, Mike Taylor
Also, can we please update the chromestatus entry title so "WebGPU
Subgroups experimentation" is less confusing on
https://chromestatus.com/roadmap?
On 1/16/25 9:35 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
LGTM3
On 1/16/25 9:31 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:
LGTM2
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:28 PM Chris Har
LGTM3
On 1/16/25 9:31 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:
LGTM2
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:28 PM Chris Harrelson
wrote:
Great! LGTM1
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 8:02 AM 'Alan Baker' via blink-dev
wrote:
We've just merged the spec after it got its final approval.
On W
LGTM2
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 5:28 PM Chris Harrelson
wrote:
> Great! LGTM1
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 8:02 AM 'Alan Baker' via blink-dev <
> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> We've just merged the spec after it got its final approval.
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 11:13:34 AM UTC-5
Great! LGTM1
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 8:02 AM 'Alan Baker' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> We've just merged the spec after it got its final approval.
>
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 11:13:34 AM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote:
>
>> Great thanks, sounds like a very useful OT.
>>
We've just merged the spec after it got its final approval.
On Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 11:13:34 AM UTC-5 Chris Harrelson wrote:
> Great thanks, sounds like a very useful OT.
>
> Now we're just waiting for the spec PR to land, since it seems to be
> approved.
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 7:1
Great thanks, sounds like a very useful OT.
Now we're just waiting for the spec PR to land, since it seems to be
approved.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 7:13 PM 'Alan Baker' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> The origin trial resulted in the following findings:
>
>1. This functionalit
The origin trial resulted in the following findings:
1. This functionality can achieve the performance improvements we
expected. Meet integrated the functionality into some of its ML shaders.
Benchmarking subgroups vs integer dot products (previous best) for
matrix-vector multiply shad
Ok thanks for clarifying that this is shipping and not further
experimentation.
Could you share the findings from the origin trials?
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 11:31 AM 'Alan Baker' via blink-dev <
blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
> I've filed the standard's position issues (and added to the feature).
I've filed the standard's position issues (and added to the feature). Here
they are for reference:
- Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1160
- WebKit: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/446
The name was a bad choice. I wasn't familiar with this
Also:
* The spec PR needs to land
* What do you mean by "experimentation" in the title of this Intent?
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:30 AM Alex Russell
wrote:
> Hey Alan,
>
> Just for the avoidance of future friction, we try to use the explicit
> signals systems from Apple and Mozilla because they'
11 matches
Mail list logo
