Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Thanks all! I've updated the explainer (it's now one unified explainer for both events). On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 11:37 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 > > Please do ping this thread with an updated explainer once you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

LGTM3 Please do ping this thread with an updated explainer once you have it. On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:16 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-06-12 13:14, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > > LGTM1 > > This seems like a useful addition, with lots of developer demand. While > more

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-06-12 13:14, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: LGTM1 This seems like a useful addition, with lots of developer demand. While more detailed explainers would have been helpful, I don't feel it's a blocker atm, as the demos provided helped me understand what we're shipping and

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

LGTM1 This seems like a useful addition, with lots of developer demand. While more detailed explainers would have been helpful, I don't feel it's a blocker atm, as the demos provided helped me understand what we're shipping and how developers will use it. On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 4:46 PM Adam Argy

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Slightly different strategy to share a public photo https://photos.app.goo.gl/5vHQ4cecJqHWN7DGA, try this one? 😅 On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 12:36 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 5:47 PM 'Adam Argyle' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 5:47 PM 'Adam Argyle' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Indeed, developer sentiment is full of excitement! Who wouldn't want to > throw out their hyper intersection observers with a perfectly timed > callback? or even better, getting insights into the concept

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Indeed, developer sentiment is full of excitement! Who wouldn't want to throw out their hyper intersection observers with a perfectly timed callback? or even better, getting insights into the concept of "changing" which is currently opaque to authors. > Philip: For the scrollsnapchange event it's

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Thanks for the link, Phillip. Absolutely agree that this is an unmet need and something we should have added long ago; I'd just like to see evidence that we're matching that need with a sufficient solution and that we've done our homework. There's almost nothing worse than getting to the end of

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

> > Hi Alex, thanks for yout input! (Like Tab said, we’re planning to have a review of the feature as a whole so I plan to share any feedback from that here, but since that won’t happen for at least another week, I wanted to update this thread in the meantime.) >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 12:16 PM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Developer excitement about this is evident in > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/156. It was filed by a web > developer and the 100 thumbs up are probably mostly from other web > developers. > > These events seem like obvious mi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Developer excitement about this is evident in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/156. It was filed by a web developer and the 100 thumbs up are probably mostly from other web developers. These events seem like obvious missing functionality similar to the scrollend events, without the event

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Ok, looking at these explainers, I'm not sure we have enough to go on to approve this Intent right now. First, use-cases are listed, but no example code is provided to show what developers have to do today vs. how this new design will address what's problematic about the current situation. Thes

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

For the avoidance of doubt, we don't block on WG consensus. If there's sufficient evidence that a feature has been developed with high quality and strong developer support, that's enough for us. CSS WG blessing is strictly nice-to-have. On Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-7 Emilio Cobos

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

Sounds good, thanks Tab! -- Emilio On Tue, May 28, 2024, 22:47 Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 1:04 PM 'Emilio Cobos Álvarez' via blink-dev > wrote: > > Has this been reviewed by the CSSWG? (not only the PR I mean, but the > > feature as a whole). The spec PR: > > https://gith

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Snap Events

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 1:04 PM 'Emilio Cobos Álvarez' via blink-dev wrote: > Has this been reviewed by the CSSWG? (not only the PR I mean, but the > feature as a whole). The spec PR: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9515 > > Doesn't mention any issue or discussion in a CSSWG call. Usual