On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 1:04 PM 'Emilio Cobos Álvarez' via blink-dev <blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Has this been reviewed by the CSSWG? (not only the PR I mean, but the > feature as a whole). The spec PR: > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9515 > > Doesn't mention any issue or discussion in a CSSWG call. Usually having > a resolution for a new feature is a requirement to get it merged... > > We recently discussed a similar process mishap in > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7767, would be good not to > repeat it.
The feature was discussed and resolved on back in 6985 <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6985#issuecomment-1049029573> (the issue is originally just about pseudo-classes, but the discussion on the call was about snap events as well, and the resolution covered that explicitly). We've also discussed some of the features's issues in the WG in the last few months. But since it's been a while since the original resolution, I've gone ahead and tagged 6985 with Agenda+ just to give a heads-up to the group. (David and flackr will be able to discuss it on the WG call next week; I'll be at CSS Day. Or we can talk about it at the f2f in two weeks.) > I see some follow-up issues on naming and such things are still open > (though some /do/ have resolutions). Do you plan to update the spec and > tests? The relevant issues have all been resolved, but you're right, only the naming one had been editted so far. David's working on the other two (bubbling, and pseudo-elements), and we'll get them reviewed and merged asap. Thanks for the heads up. ~TJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAWBYDDH-x1XvnoLM2qAx39%2BLMo0wZZ23Rxysa-jcz6%3DzsMFNA%40mail.gmail.com.
