Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Excellent, we have a plan! On Wednesday, December 20, 2023 at 7:13:36 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM3, with same condition. > On 12/20/23 11:58 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM2 to ship, with a commitment to move this part of the spec to WICG if > it gets removed from the mediacapture-ext

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

LGTM3, with same condition. On 12/20/23 11:58 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 to ship, with a commitment to move this part of the spec to WICG if it gets removed from the mediacapture-extensions spec. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:06 AM Alex Russell wrote: LGTM1 On Thursday, Decembe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

LGTM2 to ship, with a commitment to move this part of the spec to WICG if it gets removed from the mediacapture-extensions spec. On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:06 AM Alex Russell wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 8:00:41 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: > >> Sounds good Henrik! Yes, fro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

LGTM1 On Thursday, December 14, 2023 at 8:00:41 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: > Sounds good Henrik! Yes, from our brief discussion in the API owners > meeting I believe you have support from at least 3 API owners to proceed in > this direction. It's important to us that we engage constructively in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Sounds good Henrik! Yes, from our brief discussion in the API owners meeting I believe you have support from at least 3 API owners to proceed in this direction. It's important to us that we engage constructively in the standards process even in areas of differing opinion, but it's also crucial to o

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Thanks, Rick. Responses inline. On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 6:39:48 PM UTC+1 Rick Byers wrote: I looked into the details of the standards debate on this issue. It sounds like it's still unclear whether the spec for this has WG support or not, right? I certainly wouldn't want to mislead a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:39 PM Rick Byers wrote: > I looked into the details of the standards debate on this issue. It sounds > like it's still unclear whether the spec for this has WG support or not, > right? I certainly wouldn't want to mislead anyone as to API maturity / > likely interoperab

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

I looked into the details of the standards debate on this issue. It sounds like it's still unclear whether the spec for this has WG support or not, right? I certainly wouldn't want to mislead anyone as to API maturity / likely interoperability by shipping based on a WebRTC WG specification if there

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

Contact emails h...@chromium.org, o...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org Specification https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-extensions/#the-mediastreamtrackaudiostats-interface Summary The MediaStreamTrack Statistics API, or `track.stats`, has already shipped for video tracks: see previous I2S here

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:36 AM 'Henrik Boström' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087376775053312 > > On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:09:32 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087376775053312 On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:09:32 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various > review gate bits? > On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: > > LGTM2 > On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Phi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various review gate bits? On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive st

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: *Contant emails:* h...@chromium.org, h...@

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: > *Contant emails:* > h...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org > > *Explainer:* > This is a small addition to

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

*Contant emails:* h...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org *Explainer:* This is a small addition to the MediaStreamTrack . The new `track.stats` attribute getter allows a JS app to obtain statistics of a track,