Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: scheduler.yield()

Very exciting to see this ready to ship after what sounds like a successful experiment. A few small questions... On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 6:19 AM Scott Haseley wrote: > Contact emailsshase...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/WICG/scheduling-apis/blob/main/explainers/yield-and-conti

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Mesh2D Canvas API

LGTM. I've filed a couple of issues that could improve the API shape, but they don't block the experiment. I would suggest starting a TAG review and gathering signals from other browser vendors soo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

LGTM2. On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:22 AM Thomas Guilbert wrote: > Contact emailstguilb...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specification > https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#rtcdatachannel-transferable > This is a fine specification for shipping the feature. But it's a bit sad that it's a

[blink-dev] Ready for Developer Testing: relaunch Intl Locale Info feature in newly added functions

Contact emails ft...@google.com Explainer None Specification https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-locale-info Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BSpa-LKE69LL1g5CHZ3G06XEfffauwS24atfSUQiIDY/edit?usp=sharing Summary Intl Locale Info API is a new Stage ECMAScript TC39 proposal to enhan

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: WebXR/WebGPU integration

The link was previously working for me, but I've updated it just in case. Thanks! On Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 10:32:29 AM UTC-7 Caleb Raitto wrote: > FYI, in the Chrome status entry ( > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5077077997649920), the link to this > intent to prototype is broken. >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Direct Sockets API

LGTM as an IWA OWNER (3x LGTM from Blink API OWNERS are still required according to the IWA-specific API launch process ). This API is an excellent example of a case where a small number of applications need a powerful capabilit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: WebXR/WebGPU integration

FYI, in the Chrome status entry ( https://chromestatus.com/feature/5077077997649920), the link to this intent to prototype is broken. -Caleb On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 5:52:19 PM UTC-4 Kenneth Russell wrote: > Multiple developers have verbally indicated interest in using WebGPU to > render

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM (was WebID)

Hi everyone, Recently the Privacy Sandbox team announced a new path focused on elevating user choice, instead of third-party cookie deprecation. I want to assure our stakeholders that the change in Privacy Sandbox direction does not impact t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

Using structuredClone(), developers can feature detect. See this demo failing gracefully on Stable (but it should work on Canary): https://tguilbert-google.github.io/RTCDataChannel/index.html Source code: https://github.com/tguilbert-google/tguilbert-google.github.io/blob/main/RTCDataChannel/index

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl.DurationFormat

LGTM3 On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:56 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-08-13 08:51, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > It looks like you have requested all the reviews and closed all the issues > I pointed out. LGTM1! > > On Wednesday, August 7, 2024 at 9:20:26 AM UTC+9 Domenic Deni

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

Can this API be feature detected? IOW, do developers have an easy way to figure if RTCDataChannel can be transferred? Thanks, Vlad On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:47 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM1 > > /Daniel > On 2024-08-09 01:21, Thomas Guilbert wrote: > > Contact emails tguilb...@chromium.org >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement & Ship: Transferable RTCDataChannel to dedicated workers

LGTM1 /Daniel On 2024-08-09 01:21, Thomas Guilbert wrote: Contact emails tguilb...@chromium.org Explainer None Specification https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-extensions/#rtcdatachannel-transferable Summary The RTCDataChannel interface is part of the WebRT

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: FedCM (was WebID)

Hi everyone, Recently the Privacy Sandbox team announced

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Element Reflection

Good to hear! /Daniel On 2024-08-14 15:07, alice wrote: Hi there, Yes, I'm now (finally) working on this again :) Will send a longer response once I have a more meaningful update to give. Thanks Alice On 2024-08-08 02:04, Daniel Bratell wrote: Hi from the future! About Element Reflection,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Element Reflection

Hi there, Yes, I'm now (finally) working on this again :) Will send a longer response once I have a more meaningful update to give. Thanks Alice On 2024-08-08 02:04, Daniel Bratell wrote: > Hi from the future! > > About Element Reflection, I'm curious if anyone is still working on > this or i