Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefixed text-emphasis properties

LGTM2 On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:02 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:59 PM TAMURA, Kent wrote: > >> Contact emailstk...@chromium.org >> >> Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/#emphasis-marks >> >> Summary >> >> This feature introduces 'text-emphas

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

LGTM. Good luck with the extension! -mike On Thu 16. Dec 2021 at 02:50 Hiroki Nakagawa wrote: > Good point. I think actually they don't need 4 more milestones for > starting the experiment, so extending to 100 should be enough. Let me > change the requesting milestones as follows: > > Estimated

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

Good point. I think actually they don't need 4 more milestones for starting the experiment, so extending to 100 should be enough. Let me change the requesting milestones as follows: Estimated milestones Previous experiment timeline: M94 to M98 Requested extension timeline: *M99 to M100* On Thu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 9:16:54 AM UTC+9 Seokho Song wrote: > Hi, mike! Thanks for response :) > On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 3:39:16 PM UTC+9 mike...@chromium.org > wrote: > >> Hi Seokho, >> >> Thanks for working on this! >> >> On 12/9/21 6:56 PM, Seokho Song wrote: >> >> Contac

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefixed text-emphasis properties

LGTM1 On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:59 PM TAMURA, Kent wrote: > Contact emailstk...@chromium.org > > Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/#emphasis-marks > > Summary > > This feature introduces 'text-emphasis', 'text-emphasis-color', ' > text-emphasis-position', and 'text-emphasis-st

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefixed text-emphasis properties

Contact emailstk...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/#emphasis-marks Summary This feature introduces 'text-emphasis', 'text-emphasis-color', ' text-emphasis-position', and 'text-emphasis-style' CSS properties. They are unprefixed versions of existing '-webkit-tex

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Allow infinity, -infinity and NaN in CSS calc()

Hi, mike! Thanks for response :) On Saturday, December 11, 2021 at 3:39:16 PM UTC+9 mike...@chromium.org wrote: > Hi Seokho, > > Thanks for working on this! > > On 12/9/21 6:56 PM, Seokho Song wrote: > > Contact emails > > 0xde...@gmail.com > > Explainer > > https://github.com/DevSDK/calc-infin

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

At the moment, I think we can safely ship: - RTCRtpEncodingParameters extension scalabilityMode ( https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-svc/#dom-rtcrtpencodingparameters-scalabilitymode ) We have an open discussion on whether or not to ship this part on senders (we've decided not to ship it on receivers):

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Thank you! +1 to it sounding like this will be fine. LGTM4 Of course we'll need to keep an eye out for regressions being filed during dev/beta but we should be able to rely on any such bug getting routed quickly to you Sonia as a result of bisecting. Don't hesitate to reach out to any of us if you

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

There seems to be agreement to add support for referenceScaling in Media Capabilities (https://github.com/w3c/media-capabilities/issues/182) so I'm assuming that a PR will follow. Chris - please jump in if I'm misunderstanding the consensus on Issue 182. RTCRtpEncodingParameters.scalabilityM

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

Re origin trial: We did discuss about origin trials, but we are not anticipating any changes to the web API. Note that `unsanitized` option is a member of `ClipboardItemOptions` dictionary and we are not changing the shape of the existing read/write methods. Also, since this feature would benefi

[blink-dev] RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

Hi Yoav, That comment is specifically for adding the `unsanitized` option to the clipboard API spec to which Apple opposed as they don't want to support(at least currently) reading/writing custom format or unsanitized well-known format if it's not within the same origin. That means, exchanging

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

Thank you all! 1. I'll land the metrics CL and follow up here. 2. The discussion in the WebKit mailing list is ongoing, so I'll report back when it's done. Cheers, Hongchan On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 8:58 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3. > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 8:47 AM Mike Taylor > wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

Hi Bernard, Can you clarify what the consensus is on RTCRtpEncodingParameters's scalabilityMode member? That remains in https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-svc/, but will it be removed? Meanwhile, referenceScaling is only partly spec'd, there's no IDL for it but a link to https://github.com/w3c/media-cap

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLInputElement showPicker()

LGTM3 On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 7:51:30 AM UTC-8 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 4:18:50 PM UTC+1 Mike West wrote: > >> LGTM1. >> >> Given that this codifies existing Chrome behavior in a way that it seems >> like other vendors can get on board with, I'm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

LGTM3. On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 8:47 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 w/ same condition. > > On 12/15/21 11:47 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 conditional on those metrics landing (but no need to wait for data > from the metrics to come in). > > On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 3:22:26 PM UTC+1 Mike T

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

Coming back to the intent-to-ship part: do you consider it ready for approval? Or are there more spec or other issues to iron out before we should consider approval? On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:50 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > I think it's ok. LGTM. Thanks for doing your best to ship a high-quality >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

LGTM2 w/ same condition. On 12/15/21 11:47 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 conditional on those metrics landing (but no need to wait for data from the metrics to come in). On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 3:22:26 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: To circle back - last week we (myself + some other

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: AudioContext.outputLatency

LGTM1 conditional on those metrics landing (but no need to wait for data from the metrics to come in). On Monday, December 6, 2021 at 3:22:26 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > To circle back - last week we (myself + some other privacy/anti-covert > tracking reviewers) met with some folks working on

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

One idea I have here is that unless everyone agrees to a plan, this might be suitable for an origin trial. That would allow the major sites that have said they want this to try it out without locking ourselves into a certain API shape. /Daniel On 2021-12-15 17:21, Yoav Weiss wrote: Reading th

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Pickling for Async Clipboard API

Reading through the issues, I saw this comment , which suggests that the `unsantizied` option would be removed. That change is not yet reflected in the explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLInputElement showPicker()

LGTM2 On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 4:18:50 PM UTC+1 Mike West wrote: > LGTM1. > > Given that this codifies existing Chrome behavior in a way that it seems > like other vendors can get on board with, I'm supportive of shipping this > more standardized mechanism for showing native UX. I do

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

In that case, do you need 4 more milestones? We've set a cap of 9 milestones for OTs generally; this would bring y'all to 8. Do you need that e

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

Hi Mike, We are aware that some sites are now running their experiments. In addition to that, another site has been preparing for the experiment. We are now actively helping them. On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:08 AM Mike West wrote: > Was any site able to try this out during the initial experiment

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

LGTM3. -mike On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:30 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Awesome - appreciate the extra due diligence here. > > LGTM2 > > On 12/15/21 9:18 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > *LGTM1* > > Thanks for doing the work of verifying this is not a breaking change! > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:17 PM Yo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLInputElement showPicker()

LGTM1. Given that this codifies existing Chrome behavior in a way that it seems like other vendors can get on board with, I'm supportive of shipping this more standardized mechanism for showing native UX. I do wonder what we're going to do with `click()` in the long term. Is there a deprecation pl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

Was any site able to try this out during the initial experimental period? Or is this really just a delayed start to the trial? I think it's reasonable to extend out 4 additional milestones, but if you really didn't see any usage at all, it might be reasonable to consider this as a new starting date

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Awesome - appreciate the extra due diligence here. LGTM2 On 12/15/21 9:18 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: *LGTM1* * * Thanks for doing the work of verifying this is not a breaking change! On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:17 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: The public equivalent is https://docs.google.com/spread

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

*LGTM1* Thanks for doing the work of verifying this is not a breaking change! On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:17 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > The public equivalent is > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WZTRBujaaFrtUaRnBOoVYzJkZuColXFN-GgToF6nR5Q/edit#gid=73457229 > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

The public equivalent is https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WZTRBujaaFrtUaRnBOoVYzJkZuColXFN-GgToF6nR5Q/edit#gid=73457229 On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:46 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi Sonia, > > Could you please make this spreadsheet public? > > thanks, > Mike > > On 12/15/21 7:38 AM, Sonia Singl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Hi Sonia, Could you please make this spreadsheet public? thanks, Mike On 12/15/21 7:38 AM, Sonia Singla wrote: Link to spreadsheet[0] [0] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lChXA87u2r7yuBdfJu283UDsGhRGqT9ol2rVwVOQw0o/edit?resourcekey=0-yCKFjRfFk0RYeNm-d6DvFw#gid=1758573992 On Wednesd

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

Hi Yoav, The requesting milestones are from M99 to M103 (The previous milestones were from M94 to M98). On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:02 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > What are the milestones for the continued experimentation? > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:12 AM Hiroki Nakagawa > wrote: > >> Contact email

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Link to spreadsheet[0] [0] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lChXA87u2r7yuBdfJu283UDsGhRGqT9ol2rVwVOQw0o/edit?resourcekey=0-yCKFjRfFk0RYeNm-d6DvFw#gid=1758573992 On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 2:37:19 PM UTC+2 Sonia Singla wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > So I tested some pages on mac and d

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Hi Everyone, So I tested some pages on mac and did not find any visual changes or anything is breaking for the links I tested. I updated the sheet[0]. Once we get the approvals to remove the property, I will be working on patches Sonia CE Intern Igalia On Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 2:44:01

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

> > On 12/14/21 11:35 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > It seems more or less everyone agrees on this being a good thing, so it > mainly comes down to web compatibility. > > How much of the web will break, and how badly. The numbers mentioned, 0.5% > of sites set document.domain, 0.05% seem to depend o

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:51 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > On 12/14/21 11:35 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > It seems more or less everyone agrees on this being a good thing, so it > mainly comes down to web compatibility. > > How much of the web will break, and how badly. The numbers mentioned, 0.5% >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Same-origin prerendering triggered by the speculation rules API

What are the milestones for the continued experimentation? On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:12 AM Hiroki Nakagawa wrote: > Contact emails > > nhir...@chromium.org, navigation-...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > This feature: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Window Controls Overlay for Installed Desktop Web Apps

Hey, This feature has also been implemented for ChromeOS and I was wondering if it needs a separate I2S or if it should go with this same one? Most of the WML implementation worked for CrOS already just by adding CrOS to the about flag definition and to the directive conditions, e.g. reading t