On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille
> wrote:
> > Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 6 is
> used. We could
> > simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or
> we could
> > do a "cl
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 6 is used. We
> could
> simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or we
> could
> do a "cleanup" to 10 first, and start incrementing from there.
2 matches
Mail list logo
