On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgar...@exmulti.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wui...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 60000 is
> used. We could
> > simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or
> we could
> > do a "cleanup" to 100000 first, and start incrementing from there.
>
>
> It would be nice to have 100000 as the baseline, "frozen" protocol.
>
Yes, I think increasing with one is enough for now. Let's not get ahead of
ourselves :)
Wladimir
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
