Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:17:57 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > >> > Accepted for 0.6: > >> > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: >> > Accepted for 0.6: >> > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser >> >> This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC.  You need to

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > Accepted for 0.6: > > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser > > This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC. You need to > find buy-in from some other miners to make sure this

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > Accepted for 0.6: > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC. You need to find buy-in from some other miners to make sure this is what "they" want, rather than just what "you" want. -- Jeff Garzik exM

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:46:41 PM Luke-Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 3:49:16 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > > I've been busy pulling patches into git HEAD for a Bitcoin version > > 0.6, with the goal of having a Release Candidate 1 out in a couple of > > weeks. > > I've rebuilt my '

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Luke-Jr
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 5:12:07 AM Mike Hearn wrote: > Git does not produce very helpful summaries when every commit is a merge. > Is there a way to fix that? You have to guess what a change does based on > the name of the topic branch currently. Not sure what you mean. Maybe `git log --no

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Wladimir
Woohoo, 0.6.0 merging time! I'll merge some GUI pull requests for 0.6.x this/next week. Wladimir On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote: > FYI for anybody who doesn't hang out in IRC: > > I've been busy pulling patches into git HEAD for a Bitcoin version > 0.6, with the goal of h

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-21 Thread Mike Hearn
Thanks for this summary Luke. Git does not produce very helpful summaries when every commit is a merge. Is there a way to fix that? You have to guess what a change does based on the name of the topic branch currently. -- W

Re: [Bitcoin-development] Changes for version 0.6 are being pulled into HEAD

2011-12-20 Thread Luke-Jr
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 3:49:16 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: > I've been busy pulling patches into git HEAD for a Bitcoin version > 0.6, with the goal of having a Release Candidate 1 out in a couple of > weeks. I've rebuilt my 'next' and 'next-test' branches... git://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/b