On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:17:57 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Luke-Jr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:12:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Luke-Jr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > >> > Accepted for 0.6: > >> > * 81807c3 (pull 719) Coinbaser > >> > >> This is not "accepted" as discussed yesterday on IRC. You need to > >> find buy-in from some other miners to make sure this is what "they" > >> want, rather than just what "you" want. > > > > It was per Gavin on IRC before yesterday. > > Quoting IRC yesterday, > <gavinandresen> jgarzik: I defer to your judgement on coinbaser, I don't > care.
[Friday, December 02, 2011] [1:57:14 PM] <gavinandresen> luke-jr: ok-- there seems to be general consensus to pull coinbaser for 0.6, so I'll probably pull it before op_eval and rework the op_eval code to use coinbaser. > > And there is already buy-in from other miners. > > Then post data backing up that vague statement. At least Eclipse (235 GH/s) is using it, and slush (1.3 TH/s) intends to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
