Hi all,
I believe we, today, have a unique opportunity to begin to close the
book on the short-term scaling debate.
First a little background. The scaling debate that has been gripping the
Bitcoin community for the past half year has taken an interesting turn
in 2016. Until recently, there have b
Thanks for this proposal. Just some quick response:
1. The segwit hardfork (BIP HF) could be deployed with BIP141 (segwit
softfork). BIP141 doesn't need grace period. BIP HF will have around 1 year
of grace period.
2. Threshold is 95%. Using 4 versoin bits: a) BIP 141; b) BIP HF; c) BIP 141
if BI
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/314 proposes updating the status of many
Accepted BIPs to Final:
BIP 11: M-of-N Standard Transactions
BIP 14: Protocol Version and User Agent
BIP 21: URI Scheme
BIP 22: getblocktemplate - Fundamentals
BIP 23: getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining
BIP 31: Pong messa
> 1) The segregated witness discount is changed from 75% to 50%. The block
> size limit (ie transactions + witness/2) is set to 1.5MB. This gives a
> maximum block size of 3MB and a "network-upgraded" block size of roughly
> 2.1MB. This still significantly discounts script data which is kept out
>
On Monday, February 08, 2016 10:41:00 PM Peter Todd wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:55PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to
> > upgrade five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs
> > ACKs from
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:55PM +, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to upgrade
> five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs ACKs from
> the
> champions of the BIPs:
>
> BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork
Hard forks should always come in response to some major crisis that all
participants can agree is an actual crisis, as per the excellent rational here:
http://bitledger.info/why-a-hard-fork-should-be-fought-and-its-not-evil-to-discuss/
And here:
http://bitledger.info/hard-fork-risks-and-why-95-
Look, if we’re going to declare something an emergency, we cannot on the one
hand say things like: "I strongly believe bitcoin has no place in the world if
the fee raise much higher than a few cents per typically-sized transaction”,
and on the other declare that there is an emergency worth redef
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 02:36:47PM -0800, Simon Liu via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > 1) The segregated witness discount is changed from 75% to 50%. The block
> > size limit (ie transactions + witness/2) is set to 1.5MB. This gives a
> > maximum block size of 3MB and a "network-upgraded" block size of rou
Gavin, please don't quote that list on the Classic website. It's horribly
inaccurate and misleading to the general public.
> That testing is happening by the exchange, library, wallet, etc providers
> themselves. There is a list on the Classic home page:
>
> https://bitcoinclassic.com/
I know for
10 matches
Mail list logo
