On Monday, February 08, 2016 10:41:00 PM Peter Todd wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:17:55PM +0000, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Additionally, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/315 proposes to > > upgrade five additional from Draft to Final status, and preferably needs > > ACKs from the champions of the BIPs: > > > > BIP 50: March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem, by Gavin Andresen > > It may be good to update BIP 50 with the new information that calling it > a "hard fork" misses subtleties about what happened during that fork. In > particular, 0.7 rejection of the chain was non-deterministic, based on > having seen a re-org in a specific way.
I agree BIP 50 could use some rephrasing, but the May 2013 change was definitely a hardfork, despite the problems with the pre-March protocol. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
