> On Jan 2, 2024, at 10:50 AM, Michael Folkson via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> Your knowledge is incorrect. As far as I know in the getting on for 2 years
> since the first CTV activation talk/attempt literally no one has built out a
> CTV use case and demonstrated it on signet with the possibl
I think GitHub Discussions is a great idea. If we are considering proprietary
options like Google Groups, then we should definitely consider Discussions.
1. Guaranteed that nearly everyone participating here already has a GH account.
2. Offers many moderation options.
3. Good formatting abilities
Presumably the people using it feel it is an improvement. However you feel
about it, Ordinals and Inscriptions are now a part of the Bitcoin ecosystem.
Whether Ordinals deserve a BIP is yet to be determined, but it doesn’t seem
appropriate to try and force him to retract it. That solves nothing.
I appreciate your questions, ZmnSCPxj.
I will answer your second question first: Mainchain nodes do not ever validate
sidechain blocks. Sidechain nodes watch Bitcoin for invalid withdrawals, and
publish signed attestations to a public broadcast network (such as Nostr) that
a transaction is maki
x27;s better used for low-bandwidth mainchain nodes instead of for
> sidechains):
> https://gist.github.com/RubenSomsen/7ecf7f13dc2496aa7eed8815a02f13d1
>
> In theory you can also do data availability sampling through the use of
> erasure codes, but that gets very complex and brittle
Recent discussions on social media regarding drivechains have prompted me to
consider the implementation of a two-way sidechain peg within the Bitcoin
protocol. I would like to propose what I believe may be a novel solution to
this issue.
I have previously written about here on my blog:
https:
