BMP might be the answer? It seems to me one should be able to observe those
routes there.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:41 PM Douglas Fischer
wrote:
> I don't know much...
> But I imagined a solution along the lines you mentioned, Erin Shepherd.
>
> What I thought of is actually a step backwards, be
ll
> requires at least one IPv4 address, which is at minimum very cumbersome.
>
>
>
> Hope the patch makes it into the documentation, as bird is one of the
> best pieces of routing software and having an IPv6 first documentation
> would certainly benefit it.
>
> Greetin
ed or
complemented by IPv6 examples, and prepared a patch with possible changes.
Regards,
Alexander Zubkov
Hi,
Not sure how official it is. I know about this documents with something
like roadmap:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/blob/master/doc/roadmap.md
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=bird-7.html
Regards,
Alexander
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:41 PM Douglas Fischer
wrote:
> Sorry, I don't m
> import filter {
> if ( net ~ [ ::/0 ] ) then accept;
> reject;
> };
> export filter {
> if ( net ~ [ ::0/0{128,128} ] ) then accept;
> reject;
> };
> };
> }
>
> protocol bgp access_switch_1 from Upstream_Peers { neighbor
> fd00:feed::1 as 65921; }
>
> ---
Hi,
As far as I remember, when multihop option is enabled it enables (or even
forces) "gateway recursive". So it changes the behaviour of how the nex hop
is selected. This might be your issue. Could you provide more details of
what you have? The result might depend on the routes you have in your
t
ROA_UNKNOWN cannot distinguish between v4 and v6, or is it a
> bug in bird?
> (The version of bird is 2.14)
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 13:58:55 +0100
> Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Doesn't it work when using in CLI expressions? Like this
Hi,
Doesn't it work when using in CLI expressions? Like this:
show route where roa_check(...) = ROA_VALID
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:24 AM wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using roa_check().
> Is there a bird command that checks the result of roa_check() on the
> command line, not just in the conf processi
Hi,
I think multipath over device routes for ipv6 requires using new nexthop
objects. Here is an example:
# ip link add name a type dummy
# ip link add name b type dummy
# ip link set dev a up
# ip link set dev b up
# ip -6 route add fc00:0::/32 dev a
# ip -6 route add fc00:1::/32 dev b
# ip -6 r
And I think there will be no more updates:
https://bird.network.cz/?o_news
25.4.2023 BIRD 1 end of life will happen at the end of 2023. Please finish
you upgrade to BIRD 2 ASAP!
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:01 PM Douglas Fischer
wrote:
> uuuhhh... 1.6?
>
> This version has not been receiving updat
Hi,
I would check first that address used to ping from the outside is really
the same that is configured in prefsrc. I.e. no typos, etc. You could also
use tcpdump to check what IPs are actually in use.
Regards,
Alexander
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 11:17 PM Julien Sansonnens via Bird-users <
bird-us
nal information
> (for example what provider you received the default route from)?
>
>
> Yes, maybe this one.
> On Thu, November 21 2024 at 12:40 AM Alexander Zubkov
> wrote:
>
> It is still unclear what you want to achive. Do you want Linux to use both
> IPs as src a
:06 AM hans.heng wrote:
> I just think now these two VIP are unequal, because default routing will
> use 38.145.72.193 instead of 38.145.72.198… No actual problem now, just a
> question and can we achieve this?
> On Wed, November 20 2024 at 6:00 PM Alexander Zubkov
> wrote:
>
import none;
> export filter {
> if proto = direct1 then reject;
> krt_prefsrc = 38.145.72.193;
> accept;
> };
> };
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
>
> On Wed, November 20 2024 at 5:40 PM Alexander Zubkov
> wrote:
>
> You can
93 metric 32
> nexthop via 10.105.1.10 dev enp4s0f0 weight 1
> nexthop via 10.105.1.12 dev enp4s0f1 weight 1
>
> Namely, how this server sends out the traffic using new virtual ip
> 38.145.72.198 as source addr?
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
>
> On Wed, November
Hi Brian,
When I did something like that, I didn't even dig such deep to wed ipsec
tunnel policies with routing. IMHO it might work, but could hit you in
unexpected way. The option with vti looks more straightforward to me -
those guys live sepearately and do not harm each other. I.e. ipsec does i
Hi Hans,
What about just adding it to your LOCAL_NET list? If it works for the first
IP, why it shouldn't work for the other?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:36 AM Hans Heng via Bird-users <
bird-users@network.cz> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have a dual-home server, whose connection topology and configurat
Hi,
There is "from" attribute that should contain the IP address of a remote
router received via bgp protocol. But if you want to know the router ID - I
do not know about such attribute.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:38 PM Mikhail Mayorov wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thank you for explain. Of course you are rig
; attracting more traffic.
>
> Yes, I am aware we can prepend it, though it seems strange this is not
> default behavior.
>
>
>
> *Kind Regards,*
>
>
>
> Radek
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Alexander Zubkov
> *Date: *Wednesday, October 9, 2024 at 3:30 PM
-------!
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:46:07PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users
> wrote:
> > Hi Radoslaw,
> >
> > Do I get it right, that you have 2 bgp peerings here. First your route
> > passes this peering:
> >
Hi Radoslaw,
Do I get it right, that you have 2 bgp peerings here. First your route
passes this peering:
AS8075 <-> AS20940
then it passes other peering:
AS4290006033 <-> AS4290006002
Then it is an expected behaviour. Because the ASN is prepended when
route is exported over eBGP session. And the
Hi all,
It seems to me that Mikhail wants to know the protocol information, in
context of which the filter is executed. And he also wants it in the export
filter, to know protocol/peer/etc.
Regards,
Alexander
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024, 17:23 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 04:06:04P
0f0np0";
> neighbor range fe80::0/64 external;
> dynamic name "leaf";
> dynamic name digits 2;
> };
>
> protocol bgp leaf_auto_2 from ebgp_client_v6 {
> interface "enp67s0f1np1";
> neighbor range fe80::0/64 external;
> dynamic
e interface (IPv6 link-local).
> So, I'm struggling to understand what the interface option is for if you
> still need to define the list of neighbors and their ip addresses. It kinda
> defeats the purpose (I think).
>
> Br,
> Sander
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 6:31 PM
Hi Sander,
The error indicates that you are missing the neighbor's address in
your configuration.
Regards,
Alexander
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 4:54 PM Sander P wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm on Bird 2.0.8
> The background is that I'm trying to configure link local BGP sessions
> towards Juniper switches.
#x27;m not
sure that VRFs work for them at all somehow.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 5:03 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:33:30AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hi Ondrej,
> >
> > What do you think about splitting sk_setup() into different flavours?
hat
> are CAP_NET_ADMIN privileged, like setsockopt(SO_DONTROUTE).
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 02:18:20PM +0200, Christian Svensson via Bird-users
> wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 2:05 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > > I wonder if it is n
moved from sk_setup somewhere
else.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 2:18 PM Christian Svensson wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 2:05 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > I wonder if it is necessary at all to set a vrf on an accepted connection?
> > It seems to me that
Hi Christian and all!
I wonder if it is necessary at all to set a vrf on an accepted connection?
It seems to me that setting or checking vrf should be avoided instead for
an accepted connection. What do you think?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024, 11:54 Christian Svensson via Bird-users <
bird-users@network.
>
> I think it would be useful to have such extractors in place, like we do
> for lc lists.
>
>
>
> *Kind Regards,*
>
>
>
> Radek
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Alexander Zubkov
> *Date: *Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 7:42 PM
> *To: *"Ochalski, R
Hi,
I think you can use "for" loop to work with a list of communities. But for
ec there are currently no operators to access its inner components. I think
partly because nobody has suggested such operators and their semantics yet.
Regards,
Alexander
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ochalski, Rados
e75f80e9e545a#aa0b6ef7f4f7e5b9ffe1c80813d128cb4568fa53_140_140
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 4:08 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:26:17AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Slightly modified the patch (names & description) in spite of the
> > ch
Hi all,
Slightly modified the patch (names & description) in spite of the
checksum verify semantics.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 9:03 AM Ville O wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 9:05 PM Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 3:04 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Nobody has done it yet, so I've tried to implement it. The patch is
> > attached. Of course f
able and off by default. For more
> information on how to contribute, see the contributing guidelines:
>
> https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
>
> Thank you for raising awareness about this issue.
>
> Maria
>
> – Maria Matejka (she/her) | BIRD Team
Hi all,
I've noticed this patch:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/00b139bd25c77b401d2065283cb970d9d8c1aa02
It says that "(net, metric) is the primary key". But for my
understanding the primary key in linux routing table also includes
tos. It seems that BIRD currently does not support rout
Hi,
Could it be issue with a source port? It is described in the documentation,
btw:
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=bird-6.html#ss6.3
On Sat, Jun 8, 2024, 03:51 Maria Matejka via Bird-users <
bird-users@network.cz> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On first sight this looks like Fortinet ignoring th
Hi,
Do you alter krt_metric in you kernel protocol export filter? That could
cause such problem. There was recently a question about it in this mailing
list.
Regards,
Alexander
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024, 03:40 이재용 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We use BIRD for communication with servers with higher-level switc
Say you have router A having routes with localpref 50, and router B with
localpref 100. When A receives a prefix from B, it will be the best in A's
table. Router A will not try to propagate routes with localpref 50, because
only the best route are propagated (usually). And as the best route is that
76,102) (15576,1000)
> BGP.otc: 209898
>
> The only difference to other routers is that the bgp local preference is
> 50, but from my understanding it should still be exported via iBGP.
>
> BR,
>
> Nico
>
> Alexander Zubkov writes:
>
> > OK, I see th
OK, I see that routes you showed have best from protocol ibgp. So I suppose
they received from ibgp peer, and your are sending them to ibgp peer too.
That is not allowed by default.
On Fri, May 17, 2024, 17:00 Nico Schottelius
wrote:
>
> Ciao Alexander,
>
> Alexander Zubkov writes:
Hello,
Just curious. You've done "reload out" to your session after changing
the filter, right?
Regards,
Alexander
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 4:45 PM Nico Schottelius via Bird-users
wrote:
>
>
> Hello bird users,
>
> I've a strange case in which a router does not export routes that are
> matched b
Hi,
You do not need to define neighbors for BGP sessions explicitly in
your BFD config. They are created automatically for BGP sessions with
BFD enabled. In that case, I suppose, you won't get errors for the
missing neighbors.
Regards,
Alexander
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:16 PM Fran via Bird-user
Hello,
It would be helpful if you showed "ip route show" instead of "ip route
get" for your routes, so that one could see actual routes you have in
the routing table. Please also show you bird configuration.
Regards,
Alexander
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 8:53 AM Yasen Atanasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
Hi,
I think you need to start with explaining why do you want to keep
customer and upstream routes in separate tables.
Regards,
Alexander
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:39 PM LU wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I have two BGP routers with bird 2.4. Each router maintains some eBGP
> connections to upstreams wh
Hi,
Maybe Darwin would be enough for testing this? It seems to me, that is
should contain all the necessary staff used by bird. Although, I do
not have experience with Darwin.
Regards,
Alexander
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 2:34 PM Tom Herbers wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> GitHub offers free macOS Runners via
Hi all,
I noticed in the new version 'show bfd sessions' was extended with
'all' option. But I also noticed that in case of 'show protocols',
'show ospf state|topology' this option comes before [name], but for
'show bfd sessions' it is the other way. I think it would be better to
be consistent her
Hi Robert,
You can import route from the kernel table and apply blackhole policy
based on its parameters like krt_metric or something else. You can
also import such routes from non-default kernel table and add it there
temporarily.
Regards,
Alexander
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:10 PM Robert Blayzor
Hi all,
Maybe it can be solved by having those kernel routes in the bird
itself? So that it knows about them and choose them as the "best". In
that case it will not reexport them back to the kernel. Recent
addition of "learn all" option to kernel protocol should be helpful
here. Haven't tried such
Hi,
This statement is wrong:
peeras = ([(65535, 1000, *)].data2);
You try to pick "data2" from the communty set (= comunity filter). Filter
itself does not contain values. You need to apply it to some community list
first. Still you'll get a community list as a result. But you can pick
"data2" o
-02-17 14:17:25.838 home_65001_ipv4.ipv4 < added 36.138.206.0/24
> 0L 15G unicast
> ```
>
> Is there any template I could use to send the full view to peer connected to
> the router directly using a vlan?
>
> Benoît
>
> On Saturday, February 17th, 2024 at 11:49, Al
Hi,
Just to be sure. 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2 are not in the single /31.
Please also provide more details. What protocol output do you show? What
route do you want from R2 to R1. Please look at things like these:
show route all
show route all export
show route all protocol
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024, 0
Hi,
For example if you want to establish several sessions over different
pathes. Also my use-case is to export routes to a BGP monitoring
system, that have fixed remote IP, but I want to send "views" from my
several upstreams, each over a separate session.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:47 AM Bernd Nau
Maybe not random, but some sorta hash will be useful here? And it
should not break the invariant mentioned by Maria. But for the hash we
still need some means to convert IP addresses to integer numbers,
because including IP into the hash seems to be reasonable.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 3:12 PM Max
Hi Marek,
Yes, there is a change of syntax in 2.14. The notifications show you
that the return type of the function was automatically inferred.
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/blob/v2.14/NEWS?ref_type=tags#L19
> User-defined filter functions that return values now should have return type
> sta
Hi Mark,
Actually the best route selection algorithm can be found here:
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=bird-2.html#ss2.1
And the preference is clearly noticed there. Have you looked for it in
some other place? If you describe how did you try to find it, I
believe it might help the develo
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:11 PM Maria Matejka wrote:
>
> On 2024-01-25 17:08, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> But I think the problem with no filters is bigger when the RTR server is out.
> It is not just the short period of time when the peer can announce anything.
> If rpki a
,
it might work like a classical filter, but than we cannot do additional
actual origin validation using rpki.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 14:41 Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> AFAIK in RPKI AS0 means implicit invalid.
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 14:31 Maria Matejka via Bird-users <
> bird-users@ne
AFAIK in RPKI AS0 means implicit invalid.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 14:31 Maria Matejka via Bird-users <
bird-users@network.cz> wrote:
> On 2024-01-25 11:55, Erin Shepherd wrote:
>
> Spitballing slightly here, but could you avoid this problem by adding
> 0.0.0.0/0+ ::0/0+ AS0 RoAs to the table and ac
Hi,
I want to also show some example of configuration generation:
https://gitlab.com/qratorlabs/example-automatic-filters
There are also a couple of links to other similar projects. Jeroen,
thanks for the reference to kees, I've added it to the list there too.
Regards,
Alexander
On Wed, Jan 24,
y.
>
> Is this something that was missed or is there an setting I am missing?
>
> Thanks,
> Luke
>
>
>
>
>
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024 um 01:24 Uhr
> > Von: "Lukas Haase via Bird-users"
> > An: "Alexander Zubkov"
Hi,
There were reports here in the list that some BFD peers do not allow
connections from non-standard ports and bird do not choose source port
specifically. So you might need to tune your sysctl like that:
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 49152 65535
Not sure if this is the case, but I would try
ly. You can set it explicitly
also. And yes, you can either use this option or override the next hop in
the effort filter.
> Thanks,
> Luke
>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 15. Januar 2024 um 00:11 Uhr
> > Von: "Alexander Zubkov"
> > An: "Lukas Haase"
> >
export none;
import where dest != RTD_UNREACHABLE;
}
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:59 AM Lukas Haase wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander
>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. Januar 2024 um 23:03 Uhr
> > Von: "Alexander Zubkov"
> > An: "Lukas Haase"
> > Cc
gt;
> I then set up a dummy device (and add it to OSPF so that it lands in birds
> routing table):
>
> # ip link add dum0 type dummy
> # ip addr add 192.0.2.209/28 dev dum0
> # ip link set dev dum0 up
> # ping -c1 192.0.2.209
> PING 192.0.2.209 (192.0.2.209) 56(84) bytes of d
Hi Lukas,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 6:23 AM Lukas Haase wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> > Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Januar 2024 um 06:31 Uhr
> > Von: "Alexander Zubkov"
> > An: "Lukas Haase"
> > Cc: bird-users@network.cz
> > Betreff: Re: Expo
Hi,
You cannot do "direct" prefix aggregation to a lager prefix in Bird
yet. But there are some ways to workaround it. You can define a static
route with recursive nex-hop like 192.0.2.x, and filter it out when it
is not reachable, but for any subprefix in /24 you would need to
define 256 of such
Hello,
Graceful restart allows not to flush the routes until the sessions are
reestablished and converged, it does not save bgp internal state. And
when the session is reestablished, the peers do initial exchange of
their routes as with a fresh start, what you can see in your mrtdump.
That is expe
Hi,
>From my understanding, there can be only one neighbor here, but you can set
different parts of it with multiple directives, i.e.:
neighbor 10.0.1.1;
neighbor as 65000;
But two different IPs would be two neighbors and you must have two separate
bgp protocols for that. Or a dynamic protocol t
Hi,
Let's resurrect this question. :) I've made a patch to illustrate what
I mean about the wildcard address in the lock object.
Regards,
Alexander
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 8:22 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:17 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
&
Hi,
Thank you!
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:35 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:50:42AM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks! I looked throught your version and it is unclear to me if the
> > sk is still added to the io loop lis
xander
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:11 AM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Updated my last patch. I found a problem with that version, it hang on
> > reconfigure sometimes. It turned out that birdsocks are added to the
Hello,
Depending on the type of events needed, besides logs or active
monitoring with birdc, one can also do things like exporting routes to
some kernel table and monitoring them using netlink. Or setup a
"monitoring" bgp (or other protocol) sessions with something like
exabgp.
Regards,
Alexander
Hi,
Looks like it is the check that the route is not returned to the
session where it was received from.
Regards,
Alexander
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 2:32 PM Ivan Agarkov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm creating a BGP lab for my students and found interesting and unexpected
> behavior.
>
> I'm getting
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023, 03:05 Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Erin, Juliusz,
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:21:57AM +0100, Erin Shepherd wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, at 03:19, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> > > That would be a problem as I specifically want to tie the source
> address
> > > filter
tables.
Regards,
Alexander Zubkov
Qrator Labs
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 5:46 PM Maria Matejka via Bird-users
wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On 8/29/23 00:13, Daniel Gröber wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 07:40:51PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>
> I've read the whole discus
Hi,
You can find some information about it here:
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=prog-2.html#ss2.10
I think (IMHO) the reason why it is not implemented as "length+text" is
because for that you need to prepare the whole response in some buffer
first to calculate its size. In the current a
Hi,
You can try to still have separate IPv4/IPv6 daemons and that may help
not to repeat the protocol sections. But simple include might not help
still, as the syntax requires you sometimes to specify "ipv4"/"ipv6"
for tables and channels for example. Some templating might be helpful
here though.
Hi,
I want to add that I had the same problem with building bird master
branch some time ago for our Arista switches. I also found that
reverting f8bcb037b5b71a19209f1b63d52895c8c34c675b helps and maked the
build successful. But we did not try it in production yet.
Unfortunately, upgrading the ker
Hi,
I'm sure one of the attributes mentioned in the documentation fits your
need:
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=bird-6.html#ss6.7
Regards,
Alexander Zubkov
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023, 22:20 Nigel Kukard via Bird-users <
bird-users@network.cz> wrote:
> Hi there fello
for BGP sessions in direct gateway
> mode (mainly direct EBGP sessions).
>
> I was thinking to increase BGP preference (not bgp local pref) on leafs to
> prefer routes from tor and not to compare them with the same routes from
> spine (I don’t like this workaround)
>
>
>
Hi Dariusz,
Will ASPATH prepends work for you?
Or this feature might help you:
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc&v=20&f=bird-6.html#bgp-aigp
Regards,
Alexander Zubkov
Qrator Labs
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:43 AM Mazur, Dariusz via Bird-users
wrote:
>
> Hello Bird Users,
>
And I forgot to ask about kw_sym. "kw_sym: FROM_HEX" definition is not
needed? To provide fallback for someone using such name in config
already.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 3:55 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Good news, thanks!
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7
Hi,
Good news, thanks!
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:11 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Have you had a chance to look at all this?
>
> Hi
>
> Sorry for keeping you wait, i finally got
Hi,
Have you had a chance to look at all this?
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:55 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> And the final patch for the bytestring documentation. Also slightly
> modified radv documentation patch - added a semicolon in the end of
> the example.
> I
Hi,
That is exactly what "filter" function does. Something like this:
bgp_community.filter([(64511,*)]);
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 17:15 Marek Küthe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently discovered a new filter for myself on
> https://bgpfilterguide.nlnog.net/guides/many_communities/#bird. In my
> eyes i
ind. So if you
would also like not to name it "bytestring", I can alter the pathes
for it.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 1:21 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> Patch for RAdv documentation for a new custom option.
>
> I was also thinking about the new bytestring type. I needed th
Hello,
I've found a typo in the documenation. The problem is the "/" symbol
in the prefix mask that finishes the formatting definition. The patch
is attached.
Best regards,
Alexander Zubkov
diff --git a/doc/bird.sgml b/doc/bird.sgml
index 81568b95..577f9535 100644
--- a/doc/bird
STRING:
int len = strlen(val.val.s);
struct bytestring *bs = cfg_allocz(sizeof(*bs) + len);
I can prepare a new set of patches or you can fix it ad-hoc.
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 1:59 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 2:13 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 2:13 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:54 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:43 PM Ondrej Zajicek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 03:24:47AM +0200, Alexander Zubko
Also try to enable debugging. It might log something about why it
cannot resolve the recursive route.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 4:48 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Not sure, but I would guess it can be related to the local address. It
> might try to pick the first inte
Hi,
Not sure, but I would guess it can be related to the local address. It
might try to pick the first interface with such network. Could you try
your setup with some route that has the nexthop from a unique subnet
configured on the interface? At least to check if it will become
reachable or not.
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:54 PM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:43 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 03:24:47AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 3:16 PM Ondrej Zajicek
> > > wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:43 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 03:24:47AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 3:16 PM Ondrej Zajicek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 02:20:03AM +0200, Alexander Zubko
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 3:16 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 02:20:03AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > > Yes, the original idea there was to add bytestring as a data type, make
> > > hex() a regular (filter) function instead of special function-li
Hello!
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 3:30 PM Maria Matejka wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On 6/24/23 15:13, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:57:10AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> Also, I think that the current realization in bird relies on the fact
> that l
Attached the patch with the new syntax for custom options and to use WALK_LIST.
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 3:32 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 02:03:08AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 17:47 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > > The only
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 18:30 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:40:47AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please look at these patches:
> >
> > bytestring-hex-prefix.patch - syntax with "hex:" prefix
> > I allowed mix
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 17:47 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 01:08:15PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently one can use only a predefined set of advertised options in radv
> > protocol, that are supported by bir
Hi,
Please give some feedback.
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 3:57 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While waiting for the fate of the previous patches, I was thinking
> about that thing about using keywords as symbols. So here is another
> longread. :)
>
> Now it is not p
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
