Re: [PATCH] adding custom options in radv protocol, strict ipv6 regex

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 04:20:04AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote: > And I forgot to ask about kw_sym. "kw_sym: FROM_HEX" definition is not > needed? To provide fallback for someone using such name in config > already. I plan to add all keywords to kw_sym (through M4 macro) in some followup commit,

Re: [PATCH] adding custom options in radv protocol, strict ipv6 regex

And I forgot to ask about kw_sym. "kw_sym: FROM_HEX" definition is not needed? To provide fallback for someone using such name in config already. On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 3:55 AM Alexander Zubkov wrote: > > Hi, > > Good news, thanks! > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:11 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH] adding custom options in radv protocol, strict ipv6 regex

Hi, Good news, thanks! On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:11 PM Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Have you had a chance to look at all this? > > Hi > > Sorry for keeping you wait, i finally got to this patchset and merged it. No p

Re: hardware preference

Hoi I write a lot about (kernel and user space) routing performance on https://ipng.ch/s/articles/ including hardware and dataplane acceleration (with VPP and DPDK) on small (Fitlet2 or PCEngines), medium (Supermicro Xeon 1518D or Netgate 6100), and very large (Ryzen/Milan/Xeon Platinum) systems,

hardware preference

Hello community, I don't know if there is any obstacle for me to ask this kind of question. Everything is fine in terms of software, but can I get a hardware suggestion that millions of packages will pass through live with the servant? Do you have experience with an intel cpu and chelsio t4 nic

Re: [PATCH] adding custom options in radv protocol, strict ipv6 regex

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote: > Hi, > > Have you had a chance to look at all this? Hi Sorry for keeping you wait, i finally got to this patchset and merged it. I did some changes: 1) Removal of support for multiline string literals - the patch is simple but i

Re: Bird considers the VRF interface to be outside the VRF

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 12:25:41PM +0200, Erin Shepherd wrote: > Bird only treats the interfaces enslaved to the VRF as part of the VRF, > but not the VRF virtual interface itself. This means that e.g. OSPF won't > pick up loopback addresses defined on the VRF interface itself. You have > to additi

reset rx_limit/in_limit when routing table rt_count becomes less than these limits

Hi, Currently I see channel rx_limit/in_limit are reset during protocol reconfiguration or reload. Is it possible to call channel_reset_limit while withdrawing routes, when table route count becomes less than configured rx_limit/in_limit ? Regards, Bala.

Re: kernel: does not learn routes with RTPROT_KERNEL

Hello! On first sight, this looks good. Gonna do some checks and tests and let you know whether anything more is needed from you. Thank you for your patch! Maria On 8/24/23 01:38, Pavel Šorejs via Bird-users wrote: Here is first version - based on master Pavel ---  doc/bird.sgml