Honestly why both of you try to reinvent the wheel - e.g.
https://www.consul.io/discovery.html ?
Best regards,
Łukasz Jarosz
niedz., 1 gru 2019, 06:55 użytkownik Lars Ekman G
napisał:
> Hi,
>
> The patch is below.
>
> Q1: huh?
> Q2: Yes we "watch" the service
> Q3: Yes, goBGP. It is simpler to
Hi,
The patch is below.
Q1: huh?
Q2: Yes we "watch" the service
Q3: Yes, goBGP. It is simpler to adapt than BIRD, but lacks functionality. If
BGB is all you need it may be a good option.
Regards,
L Ekman
diff --git a/proto/bgp/config.Y b/proto/bgp/config.Y
index 7279560b..fbfade8f 100644
--- a
On sam. 30 nov. 23:50:48 2019, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> We are using “Intel Corporation 82576 Gigabit Network Connection” NICs.
And “Broadcom Limited NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet”, sorry I
forgot this box.
--
Alarig
On sam. 30 nov. 23:31:39 2019, Frederik Kriewitz wrote:
> We don't know if this might be NIC related yet. We're seeing it happen
> with Intel X710 NICs (With all offloading features disabled). Which
> NICs are you using?
We are using “Intel Corporation 82576 Gigabit Network Connection” NICs.
--
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:26 PM Benedikt Neuffer
wrote:
> as far as I see one need some traffic to reproduce the issue. Without
> traffic I haven't seen the issue.
Yes, we saw this behaviour too using the buster kernel. It seems to be
traffic and/or neighbours related.
Forwarding itself seems to
I saw it in production with ~20 VMs, but I don’t know how much is needed
to trigger it.
On sam. 30 nov. 11:43:29 2019, Stefan Jakob wrote:
> Can anyone provide test configs?
>
> Is it testable inside two or three VMs?
>
> Could offer 5.3.X tests here.
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:48 PM Alarig
Hi all,
On 30.11.19 11:43, Stefan Jakob wrote:
> Can anyone provide test configs?
>
> Is it testable inside two or three VMs?
>
> Could offer 5.3.X tests here.
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:48 PM Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>>
>> On jeu. 21 nov. 18:12:17 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>>> Perhaps try ke
Can anyone provide test configs?
Is it testable inside two or three VMs?
Could offer 5.3.X tests here.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 6:48 PM Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>
> On jeu. 21 nov. 18:12:17 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Perhaps try kernel 5.2.x or 5.3.x from buster-backports?
>
> I’m very interest
Hi Lars,
Hi Bird-List,
Could you share the patch for this workaround please?
Guess we share the same goals?:
a) I want to announce a /32 (IPv4) or /128 IPv6 of course per service.
b) I want to run multiple services on one single maschine in (Linux)
namespaces, f.e. via Docker
c) I want each serv
