Folks,
Anybody in the team has any thoughts/idea on this subject.
Regards
Reji Varghese
From: Bird-users on behalf of Reji Varghese
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 4:07 PM
To: bird-users@network.cz
Subject: VRF Support
Hello Team,
Want to quickly check this.
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>> And routes from other protocols with normal IPv6 channels should be
>> transformed to SADR routes with a ::/0 source?
>
> That is a tricky issue. I see four possibilities:
>
> 1) Some hack that allows connecting IP6 channels to SADR_IP6 tables,
> so unmodified protocols
On 05/23/2017 07:29 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Dean wrote:
On 05/23/2017 03:04 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
My opinion is that behavior of OSPF and Kernel protocols should be
consistent. If OSPFv3 uses one channel and one table for SADR and
non-SADR routes,
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:27:43PM +0200, Dean wrote:
> On 05/23/2017 03:04 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> >My opinion is that behavior of OSPF and Kernel protocols should be
> >consistent. If OSPFv3 uses one channel and one table for SADR and
> >non-SADR routes, then Kernel should do the same and the
Hello,
I'm trying to implement NetJSON [1] in Bird to expose the OSPF topology
using the NetworkGraph[2] specification of NetJSON.
I started tweaking the ospf_sh_state to print the topology of my test
network. However, using the cli_msg() macro my json is printed in birdc
with some ???< > sy
I can post some screencaps if you or anyone else is interested.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid Turbo 2.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Israel G. Lugo
wrote:
>
> On 05/23/2017 01:07 AM, Jason Kopacko wrote:
> > Yes I sure do.
>
> That's great! :)
>
> > All I need at this point for
On 05/23/2017 03:04 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
My opinion is that behavior of OSPF and Kernel protocols should be
consistent. If OSPFv3 uses one channel and one table for SADR and
non-SADR routes, then Kernel should do the same and there is no
reason to connect two Kernel protocols to one kernel t
Thanks!
Please don't get to high of an expectation. I am a Cisco route/switch guy
learning to code python for this endeavor. I have the front end web
interface mostly complete. I am working on some behind the scenes expansion
of the data gained via BIRD by using SNMP to gather additional device an
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:34PM +0200, Dean Luga wrote:
> @@ -1394,7 +1404,8 @@ nl_parse_route(struct nl_parse_state *s, struct
> nlmsghdr *h)
>struct rtattr *a[BIRD_RTA_MAX];
>int new = h->nlmsg_type == RTM_NEWROUTE;
>
> - net_addr dst;
> + net_addr dst, sadr_src;
> + net_fill_ip6
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:35PM +0200, Dean Luga wrote:
> struct static_route {
> diff --git a/sysdep/linux/netlink.c b/sysdep/linux/netlink.c
> index d89ae10..073bf65 100644
> --- a/sysdep/linux/netlink.c
> +++ b/sysdep/linux/netlink.c
> @@ -1937,7 +1937,8 @@ krt_sys_start(struct krt_proto *p)
Hi guys,
forgive me for my ignorance, but I just compiled 1.6.3-1 on a scientific linux
6.8 machine with ncurses 5.7 and installed that RPM on a centos7
machine with ncurses 5.9 and it all seems to work just fine.
What am I missing here?
Groet,
Stefan
On 17.05.2017 15:20, Stefan Plug wrote:
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
