Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> writes: >> And routes from other protocols with normal IPv6 channels should be >> transformed to SADR routes with a ::/0 source? > > That is a tricky issue. I see four possibilities: > > 1) Some hack that allows connecting IP6 channels to SADR_IP6 tables, > so unmodified protocols could add SADR routes with a ::/0 source.
Semantically, a SADR-aware route with source ::/0 is equivalent to a non-SADR aware route. So what about a variant of this that makes the SADR information be always available in the routing table, and just filters out routes with non-zero source prefix for protocols that are not SADR-aware? I'm not sure if it's even necessary with a separate address type for SADR in this case? -Toke
