On 2.5.2017 20:53, Damien Clabaut wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While looking for changelog I notived you made a small mistake on this
> page: http://bird.network.cz/?o_news
>
> The date of last 2.0.0-pre1 is set in 2016.
Fixed. Thank you.
Ondrej
Hello,
While looking for changelog I notived you made a small mistake on this
page: http://bird.network.cz/?o_news
The date of last 2.0.0-pre1 is set in 2016.
Regards,
On 29/04/17 06:46 PM, Ondrej Filip wrote:
Dear BIRD users,
Let me announce a new addition to 2.0.x branch.
Please note, 2
❦ 2 mai 2017 16:47 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek :
>> Or maybe we could just ignore the error and wait for
>> the next kernel sync to catch up. Or the 8192 value could be configured
>> at build-time. What's the best option?
>
> Well, you could try increase NL_RX_SIZE to say 64k. But the best solution
>
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:16:08PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Just got an instance of BIRD dying unexpectedly after displaying the
> following message:
>
> nl_get_reply: No buffer space available
>
> It's from netlink.c:
>
> int x = recvmsg(nl->fd, &m, 0);
> if (x <
Hey!
Just got an instance of BIRD dying unexpectedly after displaying the
following message:
nl_get_reply: No buffer space available
It's from netlink.c:
int x = recvmsg(nl->fd, &m, 0);
if (x < 0)
die("nl_get_reply: %m");
Manpage for netlink(7) says an applicati
On 01/05/17 17:27, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 5/1/17 8:12 AM, Charles van Niman wrote:
>> I would also support this change.
>>
>> Currently, on software that doesn't have this policy, I feel my only
>> safe action is to install sessions disabled, ensure that an import and
>> export filter is in place
Hi Everyone
I'm not sure if this is a proper group for asking about an issue I have.
I'm new to BIRD and decided to build POC where I have a bunch of servers
(SRV1, SRV2, SRVxx) with BIRD and the same /32 prefixes on loopback
interfaces. Those prefixes are sent to RT-MAIN. To have only one act
