Clearly I dropped the ball on this. Is the iterative approach to
discovering and
specifying the additional headers, given by Steffen Neumann on 5/2/13,
still valid?
I would like to use BH if possible for maintaining RBGL. However I won't
be able
to get involved until March at the earliest.
On
Hi Vincent,
regarding BitSeq:
As far as I can remember we only removed the #include as
earlier versions of R CMD check used to complain about using iostream in
the source code. I can't fully verify it as current version of R builds
and checks without warning even without that change. (The other
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 2 May 2013 at 06:39, Vincent Carey wrote:
> | Thanks for inputs from Steffen and Steve. When a considerable block of
> time
> | opens up I will see about the effort required to have RBGL make use of
> this.
> | The compressed size