Re: [Bioc-devel] [Boostheaders-devel] Boost packaged on rforge

2015-01-04 Thread Vincent Carey
Clearly I dropped the ball on this. Is the iterative approach to discovering and specifying the additional headers, given by Steffen Neumann on 5/2/13, still valid? I would like to use BH if possible for maintaining RBGL. However I won't be able to get involved until March at the earliest. On

Re: [Bioc-devel] [Boostheaders-devel] Boost packaged on rforge

2013-05-03 Thread Peter Glaus
Hi Vincent, regarding BitSeq: As far as I can remember we only removed the #include as earlier versions of R CMD check used to complain about using iostream in the source code. I can't fully verify it as current version of R builds and checks without warning even without that change. (The other

Re: [Bioc-devel] [Boostheaders-devel] Boost packaged on rforge

2013-05-02 Thread Vincent Carey
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 2 May 2013 at 06:39, Vincent Carey wrote: > | Thanks for inputs from Steffen and Steve. When a considerable block of > time > | opens up I will see about the effort required to have RBGL make use of > this. > | The compressed size