Clearly I dropped the ball on this. Is the iterative approach to discovering and specifying the additional headers, given by Steffen Neumann on 5/2/13, still valid?
I would like to use BH if possible for maintaining RBGL. However I won't be able to get involved until March at the earliest. On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > This picks up an old thread from 2013 about Boost.Graph and BH in which > Vince > et al offered to look into what it would take to add Graph to BH. > > I now have a use case for Boost Graph, so I'll add it to BH -- but without > the ability to do parsing as we are header-only in BH. > > Boost Graph says: > > The Boost Graph Library is a header-only library and does not need to be > built to be used. The only exceptions are the GraphViz input parser and > the GraphML parser. > > Looking at the copy of RBGL 1.28 I have here on my (implicit) CRAN mirror > (via CRANberries) I see that you bundle an include directory. So it seems > I > can help you there. > > Can you confirm that you don't do parsing and do not generally link to > Boost > Graph? > > I opened an issue ticket here: > > https://github.com/eddelbuettel/bh/issues/9 > > > Dirk > > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
