On Wednesday 24 December 2008 20:13, Scott Haneda wrote:
> Trying to help a client, they stumped me today.
OK, I get the sam answers form all the NS servers.
> dig crm.share-ideas.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> crm.share-ideas.com
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>H
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:40, Baird, Josh wrote:
> I am in the process of developing a DR (disaster recovery) plan for my
> primary masters. Could someone please confirm (or correct me) that a
> second server in the "masters {}" statement of a slave zone will only be
> used in the event that
On Friday 27 February 2009 10:08, Denny Jodeit wrote:
> It's not exactly 'proper' practice, but I have successfully turned down
> the caching time to 300 seconds. Do this a week ahead of your planned
> server move.
I would not suggest turning down the TTL's a week ahead of time. This will
only
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 17:42, Ulrich David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Bind as a cache (absolutely not authoritative) DNS for a public
> network. I have put a firewall in order to refuse incoming packets from
> people not on my network.
>
> This traffic came from other DNS server in the world.
On Sunday 07 November 2010 20:02, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> I have (since several years) collected some domain names which do not
> exist (since years) and registered it in the last 4 month for the
> internal use of my Internet Service.
If these domains are for internal use only, why
On Thursday 11 November 2010 03:59, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> Yes, I do use whois, my problem is which of the many dozens of whois
> servers to ask.
>
> E.g. if you want to know who owns telephone.com(random example), do you
> ask whois.moniker.com, whois.markmonitor.com, whois.enum.com or ???.
W
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 19:43, Steve Zeng wrote:
> We have a BIND DNS master and Windows DNS slave running for a while. I
> recently configured a second DNS slave running on Linux/Centos. When I
> stop/start the second DNS slave. It gets all zone files correctly. However,
> it does not get upd
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 20:50, Steve Zeng wrote:
> I don't have NS record for both of the slaves (windows DNS slave and Linux
> DNS slave). I use "also-notify" and it works for Windows DNS slave. But not
> for BIND/Linux.
Is SELinux running on this system? I seen you are running CentOS and i
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 00:56, the following was written:
> Its very simple,
>
> If you know basic firewall concept, we will configure source NATing from
> public IP address to original website private address in firewall. So when
> any users from internet access my company website, they shou
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 02:25, the following was written:
> > Split DNS is when you have 2 DNS servers, one internal and the other
> > external. Internal server serves the clients internally and the External
> > services the people on the Internet. This setup is very easy as both
> > server ho
On Saturday 11 June 2011 09:53, the following was written:
> On Jun 11, 2011, at 4:22 AM, kshitij mali wrote:
> > Hi Mark ,
> >
> > Thanks of taking intreast in my case , yes the rhel4 default bind named
> > service is running in chroot jail , know tell we what config changes do
> > i nedd
On Friday 17 June 2011 19:53, the following was written:
> So bind-9.8.0-P2 can resolve a uk domain in Missouri but I can't get it
> to work in the UK. Could someone help me to understand why it won't
> resolve this one domain for me when it will work for other people? What
> can I do to track
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 15:13, Sandy Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone see any issues with the following scenario?
>
> DNS1 primary
> DNS2 secondary
>
> In the event we lose the site where DNS1 exists permanently.
>
> Can we simply convert the DNS2 configuration file to
On Friday 17 July 2009 16:33, Martin McCormick wrote:
> A person wrote me off list to say that it worked for them. I
> went to a different FreeBSD platform that happens to be the
> actual one that hosts our DNS and tried it there and it worked
> perfectly. I even verified that it is in the zon
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 08:16, Frank Stanek wrote:
> Please forgive my naivety if this is totally wrong but
> I don't have a chrooted bind environment to verify this atm.
I run a chroot environment
> But doesn't the init script in some distributions copy the
> configuration files (inclu
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 02:52, Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago wrote:
> El mar, 15-09-2009 a las 17:27 -0400, Robert Spangler escribió:
> > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 08:16, Frank Stanek wrote:
> > > Please forgive my naivety if this is totally wrong but
> > &g
On Friday 05 February 2010 17:41, fddi wrote:
> Hello I wanted to ask how could be possible in some way
> to have 2 or more multi master name servers authoritative for one domain,
> instead of the classical master slave model.
Simple thing to do. I have a test lab here that I did this in a fe
On Friday 05 February 2010 23:06, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Everyone who isn't a BIND expert and who touches a BIND nameserver should
> own a copy: -)
Could not agree with you more on this point.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
On Monday 22 February 2010 19:26, Geoff Sweet wrote:
> I have tried several different attempts to make this work, and the only
> change that works is to set in the options allow-query{any;};. However the
> problem with that is that it then permits anyone to make any query against
> my nameserver
19 matches
Mail list logo
