private tld

2013-08-20 Thread Maria
e the private tld? Thanks, Maria ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: private tld

2013-08-21 Thread Maria
Thank you for all of the responses, I really appreciate it. Clearly the best approach is to sign the internal tld, but at the moment I can't do that because I would need new internal servers, ours don't support dnssec. I configured it as a slave and it's working. Thanks! Maria

Re: Reinstall after modifying

2013-08-21 Thread Maria
onf or it will be overwritten in an update. If you do this for the same reason as I do, to get the pre-made /var/named/chroot directory, then you might like this. After the server is first built, I move /var/named/chroot out of harms way and remove all the bind packages.

packet size

2013-09-11 Thread Maria Iano
act to DNS in our environment would be if they dropped udp fragments at the border. It seems to me I would have to configure our name servers to drop back to tcp when a packet is over 1500. I'm trying to understand just how much that would impact the servers. Thanks, Maria _

make test fails without Net::DNS::Nameserver

2015-07-14 Thread Maria Iano
installed. After I install it the testing is successful. Maria ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

REQUIRE(rdataset->rdclass == db->rdclass) failed

2015-07-30 Thread Maria Iano
Is this a known issue with internal private TLDs and I should just give up on using a shared cache? Getting rid of our internal domain is a huge undertaking which won't be completed any time soon. Thanks, Maria ? ___ Please visit https://lis

Re: REQUIRE(rdataset->rdclass == db->rdclass) failed

2015-07-30 Thread Maria Iano
ot;in"; the reason I am using views is to make chaos bind queries work for specific client IPs only. I don't want to waste a bunch of memory doing that if I don't have to - so I put in the shared cache option. Taking it out means I have to go back and do my sums again to work o

why one shouldn't use relative hostnames

2010-11-10 Thread Maria Iano
ons of why this is a very bad thing. I would find quick access to thoughtful well-phrased arguments very useful right now. Thanks! Maria ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: why one shouldn't use relative hostnames

2010-11-12 Thread Maria Iano
causing an outage to the service/services. And if your not in control of the zone or the search order it could be difficult to rectify. -Stacey On 11/11/2010 00:30, Kevin Darcy wrote: On 11/10/2010 1:19 PM, Maria Iano wrote: We are working with a software vendor whose software only works with

looking for reference to correct behavior

2009-05-11 Thread Maria Iano
e.com as a primary zone, I think it should discard that bad A record and hand back its own. The vendor's argument is that it should blindly trust the forwarding resolver. Can anyone point me to an RFC or reference about this? Thanks, Maria ___

Re: looking for reference to correct behavior

2009-05-29 Thread Maria Iano
g and also seems to me to be a security issue. Thanks for your help anyway! Maria On May 11, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: The "resolver algorithm" in RFC 1034, Section 5.3.3, states 1. See if the answer is in local information, and if so return it to the clie

do I have this wrong?

2009-05-29 Thread Maria Iano
that zone into the cache that come from the servers to which the zone was specified to be forwarded. Never hand out data from that zone unless it was received from one of the forwarders. Thanks, Maria ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc

wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-19 Thread Maria Iano
x27;t exist and never has in the zone, then we get the answer from the wildcard. If we query a record that used to exist but was deleted and now doesn't exist, then we get no answer. We don't get NXDOMAIN, we get status: NOERROR and no answer. Has anyone else come ac

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 09:08:33PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:19:31PM -0400, Maria Iano wrote: > > We have a group of users that need to use a wildcard record in > > their zone. Their wildcard works in general, but they have a > > situation where i

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
T PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ; IN ANY ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: 300 IN SOA 2017062002 1200 600 604800 300 ;; Query time: 59 msec ;; SERVER: ;; WHEN: Tue Jun 20 10:14:58 EDT 2017 ;; MSG SIZE

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:29:59AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0400, Maria Iano wrote: > > Thanks for your answer. There are no other records with that name > > in the zone, and an ANY query comes back empty but still with > > status of NOER

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:37:04AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:29:59AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0400, Maria Iano wrote: > > > Thanks for your answer. There are no other records with that name > > > in the z

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:08:44AM -0500, Bryan Bradsby wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 10:51 -0400, Maria Iano wrote: > >  > > The queries are being directed at an authoritative server, exactly as > > you describe above. > > > > We also pay for a secondary dns

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
searching for deletedrecord* and not *.deletedrecord*. It didn't help that both of our secondary dns providers do hand back the wildcard answer to the query. I take it that means they are not using bind, and their implementations follow different rules for wildc

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
the cause - i.e. the subdomain records of the deleted records. I had searched for records beginning with the deleted names, and not records that were subdomains of the deleted names. Also, our secondary DNS providers hand out the wildcard record even though the subdomain records exist. Than

Re: wildcard not working after record deleted

2017-06-20 Thread Maria Iano
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Cathy Almond wrote: > On 20/06/2017 14:17, Maria Iano wrote: > > As has been explained already, no answer, no error means that the name > exists, but not an RRset of the type you queried for. > > Since the ANY query also comes back empt

Bind-9.5.0-P2

2009-06-25 Thread Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina
Hello Y have a problem with bind, part of file mesagges is: Jun 25 12:50:25 amon named[13443]: socket: too many open file descriptors Jun 25 12:50:26 amon last message repeated 112 times Jun 25 12:50:26 amon named[13443]: client 200.72.65.45#40268: recursive-clients soft limit exceeded, aborting

RE: Bind-9.5.0-P2

2009-06-26 Thread Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina
Tatuya / [mailto:jin...@isc.org] Sent: Jueves, 25 de Junio de 2009 18:27 To: Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind-9.5.0-P2 At Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:05:27 -0400, Del Solar Navarrete Maria Cristina wrote: > Y have a problem with bind, part of f