On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:56:31PM +0000, Evan Hunt wrote: > > On the one hand: No, this is a bug, and I'd appreciate it if you'd > bundle up your named.conf (with key secrets stripped out; you can use > named-checkconf -px to do this automatically) and the details of the query > you sent to bind9-b...@isc.org. > > On the other hand: I don't see why you'd want to share a cache between two > views if only one of them has access to the internal TLD. >
I submitted the bug report and it's ISC-Bugs #40205. I only have one view for "in"; the reason I am using views is to make chaos bind queries work for specific client IPs only. I don't want to waste a bunch of memory doing that if I don't have to - so I put in the shared cache option. Taking it out means I have to go back and do my sums again to work out what max cache sizes and number of clients to specify. Thanks, Maria _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
