Just because individual records are public doesn't mean you should allow just
anyone to configure their nameserver as a slave to your domain.
There's no benefit to allowing transfers to just anybody except for the
allowance it makes for the laziness of admins.
Weigh that against the risks
Have you tried looking up the client IP from another line in the logs from the
same time?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Haneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:45:26
To: BIND Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Help understanding lame server error
On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:19 P
ong on all versions of bind,
and queries seem fine on 9.8, I can tell for certain queries are executing
perfect like the previous versions and returning responses as they should, so I
have ruled out mysql, there must be a bug within the 9.8 source tree doing this
not updating aa SOA
ind98 dlz master
"authoratative" so would not transfer the zone, a bug I still have not
heard back on...
Dan.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Paul Ooi Cong Jen wrote:
On 08-Mar-2011, at 4:31 PM, Eivind Olsen wrote:
Cent OS+BIND 9.7.3+DLZ(BDB as backend)
# rndc reload 2mysite.net
rndc: '
Evan you looked into why a master in 9.8 will not respond as authoratative
for a dlz+mysql zone even though dig axfr zone from slave works
Dan.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Evan Hunt wrote:
Now DLZ supports dynamic updates and theoretically it is possible to make
such tricks:
rndc freeze
stalls"
on any problems.
Its like the saying, once you go black, you don't go back.
Dan.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/09/2011 11:52, pollex wrote:
Hi, I want to know in your experience what is the best operating
system to run bind for an ISP. We currently have Debian fo
sideration should be your knowledge set of unix in general,
if your linux understanding is really good, then it may be time to
graduate from newbie linux admin to senior solaris/freebsd admin, only
installing linux where necessary to make your life as easy as possible.
Dan.
On Fri, 11 Mar 201
the "cruft"
you suggest.
Its clear from that statement you don't run any BSD's and cost your
company money running RHEL vs Centos or anything free that a competent
admin could run just as well, perhaps the bit of money your company
could save you could use towards a ploy for
I'm going to end discussion here Jeff as no "personal attacks" were made,
only possible suggestions to help you and possibly try something new and
exciting in your life, this becomming more of an OS war than anything
useful to Bind mailing list, so its more suited for anothe
s version.
>
> While reading you message I realized that we messed it up and old links with
> underscore (e.g. v9_18_10 as opposed to v9.18.10) indeed do not work.
>
> I'll see if we can restore the old links, but I cannot promise any specific
> timeline.
Hey there FastEd
cleaning-interval whereas if it's 2G you won't notice the interval at all.
Also on a busy resolver expect BIND to use about twice as much as where you set
your limits.
Dan
--
Daniel Mason
Senior Engineer
CenturyLink, Inc.
Internal Use Only - Disclose and distribute only to CenturyL
be different acrossviews,
and one for the zones that need to be global.Max.___Please
visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this listbind-users mailing listbind-users@lists.isc.orghttps://lists.isc
2434
-/+ buffers/cache:368 2649
Swap: 5023 0 5023
Thanks,
Dan.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc
I understand the concept, as I have read many documents like that. I
am more interested in a real world example of how much free memory for
caching is recommended for an average server.
Dan.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> this is a common source of confusion and m
76)
R:FAIL
I'm running the "bin/tests/system/ifconfig.sh up" script, and see the "lo:1"
through "lo:7" interfaces come up. I don't have this problem on any of my
Solaris systems, just the Fedora servers. I do have several lo: interfaces
already defined, and they
er. I'll see if I can reach out to the
googlegroups folks and figure a way to sort this.
-Dan
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
ht
ut the reality is, all these methods
require someone to be querying it. Thankfully, spambots seem to do this quite
a lot, and manage to find "new" domains at an alarming pace.
-Dan Mahoney
ISC
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/l
s well as the ability to replicate your single policy zone via
standard AXFR/IXFR metrics. SpamHaus is currently making some of their data
available in this format:
http://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/669/
-Dan Mahoney
___
Please visit https://lis
ecord, in order to route mail to it, which
goes a far cry from being "a server that has no entry in the DNS".
I can't even imagine what spamfilters would think of such an address. :)
-Dan Mahoney
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mai
/named/named -m
record,size,mctx -T clienttest -c named.conf -d 99 -g >named.run 2>&1 &echo $!'
I:Checking that reconfiguring empty zones is silent (1)
... which may be part of the problem, at least in my case. So I cheated by
issuing a "find . -type d -exec chmod 777 {} \;"
So it's not.
Dan Luther
Operations Engineer
Systems Operation Engineering
Level 3 Communications
One Technology Center, Tulsa OK 74103
p: 918-547-4370
e: dan.lut...@level3.com
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy C. Reed [mailto:jr...@isc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:17
Tom,
What happens when you "dig +tcp example.com @1.2.3.4"? Specifically I'm
wondering here if the slave you're having problems with is blocking TCP port
53. Such a configuration would allow you to query the master server, but not
transfer to/from it.
Dan Luther
Operati
On Jul 24, 2013, at 4:48 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:39:53PM +0200,
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
> a message of 28 lines which said:
>
>> This was discussed here already,
[...]
>> The SPF RR is already
>> here and is preferred over TXT that is generik RR t
FFECTIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:329: error: 'CAP_SET' undeclared (first use in this function)
os.c:338: error: expected ';' before 'curval'
make[3]: *** [os.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/l
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+dan.mcdonald=austinenergy@lists.isc.org on behalf
of Maria
Sent: Wed 21-Aug-13 16:18
To: ngiw2...@hotmail.com
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Reinstall after modifying
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:18:36PM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wro
ding how this should work?
--
Dan
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
What’s the right way to delegate individual zone records to a “global server
load balancer”, which is just a simple DNS server that checks to see if a
server is up and if so adds the address to the rotation for resolution.
I’ve tried simple delegation using ns records, but I don’t get resolution
<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 3701
>;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>...
>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>gsstest.domain.com. 3599IN CNAME
>gsstest.domain.com.gslb.domain.com.
>gsstest.domain.com.gslb.domain.com. 19 IN A ip.ad.dr.es
>...
>
>
>-Or
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 18:08:57 –0400, Kevin Darcy
mailto:k...@chrysler.com>> wrote:
I'm assuming you have forwarding set up. Make sure to set "forwarders { };" in
the aelabad.net zone definition. Failure to do so means that your recursive
queries for names in subzones forward out towards the Inte
Sorry for the noise.
-Dan Mahoney
ISC
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Sorry for the noise.
-Dan
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Sorry again for the noise.
-Dan
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Dan Luther
Operations Engineer
Systems Operation Engineering
Level 3 Communications
One Technology Center, Tulsa OK 74103
p: 918-547-4370
e: dan.lut...@level3.com<mailto:name.n...@level3.com>
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/li
We have an application that that has application servers burried deep behind a
few layers of reverse proxies and load balancers, but has a hard-coded server
address in a returned java applet. To allow the java applets to work, someone
here started deploying host files containing the app servers
testing
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Sorry for the noise, please ignore.
-Dan Mahoney
ISC Ops team
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
ost.zone";
notify no;
};
zone "eglifamily.name" {
type master;
file "pri/eglifamily.zone";
notify yes;
};
zone "10.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "pri/10.168.192.arpa.zone";
notify yes;
on
using that interface.
On 12/18/2020 11:59 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
I'm really stumped as to what's going on. I'm trying to get dhcpd to
automatically update name records for my internal network. This is NOT
going to the public internet by any means. It's just an internal
network. B
Greetings bind-users netizens.
Dan Mahoney, ISC SysAdmin here.
This is a message about lists.isc.org and DMARC. If you aren't concerned
with DMARC, you can ignore it.
Over a year ago, we added adaptations to lists.isc.org to allow mail from
DMARC-protected domains to be delivered
qbWxlZWRsdz09IA=="
But when I run checkzone:
dns_rdata_fromtext: myzone.zone:26: syntax error
zone eglifamily.name/IN: loading from master file myzone.zone failed:
syntax error
What's wrong? Why is it failing?
--
Dan Egli
From my Test Server
OpenPGP_0x11B7451DF2015959.
the tool that created this record that it
is
INVALID as the field length is TOO BIG.
On 7 May 2021, at 14:35, Dan Egli wrote:
I don't know what's up, but when I tried to put my DKIM into the test server,
named-checkzone keeps giving a syntax error on the key line. Here's w
interfaces
Why not? My config file specifically says listen-on { 0.0.0.0; }; and
listen-on-v6 { ::; };
--
Dan Egli
From my Test Server
OpenPGP_0x11B7451DF2015959.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
here do I get the DS record, since i'm using bind's inline signing?
On 5/10/2021 3:29 AM, John W. Blue via bind-users wrote:
Hello Dan.
Does your registrar have the ability via a UI to place a DS record in
the .name zone?
And if so, have you done
On 5/10/2021 12:17 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
Where do I get the DS record, since i'm using bind's inline signing?
Use the dnssec-dsfromkey tool, e.g. from a key file (make sure it's the
KSK file)
$ grep This Kcam.ac.uk.+013+32840.key
; This is a
testing, please ignore
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more info
Greetings bind-users netizens.
Dan Mahoney here, ISC sysadmin/devops person.
We've upgraded the underlying system that lists.isc.org runs on, as well
as an upgrade to mailman (still in the 2.x line). This means any
searchable archives will have to rebuild over the next day.
Please repor
Greetings bind-users netizens.
Dan Mahoney here, ISC sysadmin/devops person.
We've upgraded the underlying server that lists.isc.org runs on, as well
as an upgrade to mailman (still in the 2.x line). This means any
searchable archives will have to rebuild over the next day,
Please repor
they disagree)?
Thanks for any insight,
Dan
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:29 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>
> On 22.10.21 09:57, Dan Hanks wrote:
> >As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when
> >deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use
> >whichever value
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:57 AM Dan Hanks wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> As I understand RFC 2308, when receiving an NXDOMAIN response, and when
> deciding how long to cache that NXDOMAIN response, a resolver should use
> whichever value is lower of the SOA TTL, and the SOA.mi
testing, please ignore
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more info
Sorry for the noise, attempting to validate a DKIM issue
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://
g header.i=@isc.org header.b=q/vOEba5;
> dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key;
> unprotected) header.d=isc.org header.i=@isc.org header.b=ozeUkO/Z
>
> dont know why it failed
I may as well answer this since other people chimed in on the test
rom/to/spf/dkim/dmarc
status. We can't easily inspect individual messages.
If this sounds like you, please do drop me a line privately at
dmaho...@isc.org. I'd love to work with you to ensure I understand what's
going on and also see if we can make things work better for eve
all the info you need would be “in the DNS”.
The fun derivation of “shortest distance with highest latency” is a fun
exercise for the audience.
-Dan
> On May 3, 2022, at 3:07 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Timothe Litt wrote:
>> On 02-May-22 09:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
#x27;we looked at this every
step of the way, and it looked good to us. '
===
To the best of my knowledge, we're the only folks doing this -- mailman 3 is
supposed to implement its own arc-sealing, but 2.x won't ever. Mailman 2.x is
largely EOL (but receiving security fixes -
> On Sep 27, 2022, at 02:50, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>
> On Sat 24/Sep/2022 01:10:12 +0200 Dan Mahoney wrote:
>>> On Aug 23, 2022, at 07:39, G.W. Haywood via bind-users
>>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Alessandro Vesely
Running off SSDs has also proved to help startup/reload times in our usage.
Dan Durrer
No-IP
On Mar 2, 2011, at 5:32 AM, david klein wrote:
> One other thing: on the filesystem in which reside directories that
> house the zone files, set the mount option "noatime". This wi
Yeah.. in-ip.info is probably supposed to be no-ip.info?
Dan Durrer
No-IP
On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Hi--
>
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Frank Pikelner wrote:
>> I'm having a problem resolving several hosts from NO-IP. When I attempt to
>>
Terry,
rndc freeze zonename disables dynamic updates and syncs up the current zone
data to the zone file.
rndc thaw zone name when your done editing then file.
Dan
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 19, 2011, at 7:57 AM, terry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My BIND has been using dynamic updates
files are
> identical to our old, working server. Tested with "administator" as the user
> as well, same problem.
Start a command shell as that user and try to more the file?
-Dan
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
led
"deadwood" that defaults to 2 seconds. But, I couldn't find anything on BIND.
thanks,
danno
--
Dan Pritts, Sr. Systems Engineer
Internet2
office: +1-734-352-4953 | mobile: +1-734-834-7224
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.is
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+dan.mcdonald=austinenergy@lists.isc.org
>
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+dan.mcdonald=austinenergy@lists.isc.org]
> On Behalf Of Tony Finch
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 2:43 PM
> To: Barry Finkel
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject:
because mailman asks postfix to do a "verify" (but not an
SMTP VRFY) of the addresses as part of the VERP that it does.
One annoying thing that I should note is that removing those problem users
and flushing the queues does NOT help.
-Dan
Please ignore. Internal test from ISC.
-Dan Mahoney
ISC Operations
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman
s on our site -- the htdig patchset for
mailman stopped working in a recent version of mailman and we have to
re-integrate a different search engine).
Regards,
Dan Mahoney
ISC Operations Team
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-
e htdig patchset for
mailman stopped working in a recent version of mailman and we have to
re-integrate a different search engine).
Regards,
Dan Mahoney
ISC Operations Team
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
e the pros and cons
of the two different setups?
Dan
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Mon 28.Nov.11 14:39, Doug Barton wrote:
On 11/28/2011 10:20, Dan McDaniel wrote:
I'm setting up a new DNS server. We have two offices linked by a VPN.
I'm trying to decide whether to have everything under a single domain
(example.com) or to split them into sub-domains (office1.e
g free DNS service to all takers
recursion no;
// Disable lookups for any cached data and root hints
allow-query-cache { none ; };
// all views must contain the root hints zone:
include "stdzones/named.root.hints";
// this should be a syml
the same results. The first type of record
is updated dynamically and the second type of record is added
manually.
Any ideas what that could be?
Thanks,
Dan.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this
entry to a dynamically updated zone?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 10.01.12 15:06, Dan Letkeman wrote:
>>
>> It seems as if these types of records get transfered:
>>
>> 9 PTR gvc-busdrivers.wks-gvc.domain.
Yes, I have already done this for the the forward zones:
eg domain.com is the static one and workstations.domain.com is the dynamic one
But this is my reverse zone that is shared between the two. I don't
know how you would split that up......
Dan.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:25 PM,
Latif,
If you provided records / wildcard records that matched all domains to
be rewritten, you could resolve the domain name of _all_ rewritable
traffic the IP of a particular webserver which could then forward to
the right URL using webserver scripting and an HTTP mechanism like
Location hea
;;
};
zone "dan.net" {
type master;
file "/var/named/dan.net.hosts";
allow-update {
192.168.75.1;
172.16.56.111;
192.168.75.31;
};
};
controls {
};
The zone i'm
open failed: unexpected
error
I have tried moving the zone into it's own directory and giving the
named user full rights to it but it is still unable to create the
file.
Is there anything else I can try?
Thanks,
Dan.
___
bind-users mailing lis
Hello,
Are there any issues with have domains like "location.domain.com" so
all of my hosts will be "host.location.domain.com" ? Currently we
have everything under "domain.com" and it is getting to be very messy.
Dan.
__
test, please ignore
Thanks.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:03:58 -0700
Daniel Ballenger wrote:
> I could be blind, but I don't see the PTR record for that IP in the
> zone file you pasted.
Isn't this it?
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alexandre
> Racine wrote:
>> [...]
>> 82.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR mail.bgrinformatiqu
Hello,
I need to add an entry in our dns servers for a hosted service we
purchased. Do I just add a master zone and a single entry? Or is
there a better way to add a single entry to forward to a remote
server?
Thanks,
Dan.
___
bind-users mailing list
nd the whole bit.
So i'm wondering do I need to setup a master zone, and put in the
222.222.222.222 A hosted.accounting.com as an A record, and then have
the zone forward everything else? Reason being is because our users
will still need to access other sites from the accounting company's
t which is the normal way of doing things.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Dan Letkeman
> Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:41 PM
> To: Kevin Darcy
> Cc: bind-users
> Subject: Re:
y: info: client 172.16.0.102#57854:
received notify for zone '7.0.10.in-addr.arpa'
24-Feb-2010 13:31:54.245 general: info: zone 7.0.10.in-addr.arpa/IN:
notify from 172.16.0.102#57854: zone is up to date
Dan.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Yes, we've been using the ip sla feature for some time now, works well. Bgp/
ospf via quagga also are great solutions .
Dan Durrer
No-ip.com
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
> On 2010/04/05, at 02:06, sasa sasa wrote:
>
>
d apply them to
named.conf and reconfig it resolves just fine. Anyone else experiencing this?
Can't wait for this feature to become finalized :)
Dan Durrer
No-IP.com
On Jul 28, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 7/28/2010 10:41 PM, Mike Flathers wrote:
>
>> Is the
Alan,
So is managed.zone.list and zone.list named differently on purpose or is that
a typo?
Dan
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
> On 7/29/2010 7:19 PM, Dan Durrer wrote:
>> Alan,
>>
>> I was playing around with your example. I can get it to add the
Do you guys have any hints yet on what it might look like or are you still
looking for recommendations?
Dan Durrer
No-IP
On Jul 30, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Evan Hunt wrote:
>> Note that the syntax for this set of tools (dynamic zone creation) is a
>> bit in flux and may b
zone comes back as refused.
If I run reconfig it will start answering queries, but I'm guessing that is
because its just re-reading the include from new-zone-file. Am I missing
something here?
Dan
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Dan Durrer wrote:
> Alan,
>
> So is managed
options {
...
new-zone-file "/etc/named.d/new_zones.list";
};
include "/etc/named.d/new_zones.list";
## new_zones.list
zone mynewzone.com { type slave; file "mynewzone.com"; masters { 1.1.1.1; };
};
script rndc_addzone.sh
---
#!/bin/bash
echo "Adding Zone" ${1}
cd /var/nam
Sorry for the noise
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Please ignore -- just testing post mailman upgrade.
Best,
-Dan Mahoney
ISC Operations Group
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
of the file the server appends statistics to when instructed to
do so using rndc stats."
named seems to be doing this automatically, as opposed to an external cronjob
created by myself.
2 - Is the documentation misleading in this regard?
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@lan
> On Jan 21, 2019, at 7:53 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2019, at 2:53 am, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> I'm running bind911-9.11.5P1_2 on FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p8
>>
>> bind is running fine, except for the statistics file, which gets created
&g
On 11/13/15, 4:46 PM, "bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org on behalf of Frank
Even" wrote:
>What does everyone do for monitoring their DNS traffic, if anything?
We feed the query-logs into splunk, so they can be correlated with all of
the other network logs
>I've come to a place where I need to
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 6:28 AM, MURTARI, JOHN wrote:
>
> Folks,
> Recently been looking at servers that host almost 200K ARPA
> zones and load about 80 million resource records. They run on good hardware
> and take only a few minutes to load the zones on a clean start. The i
Apparently it’s not the way to do what I needed, but I created an RPZ record
like this:
foo.example.com IN NS ns1.example.org
IN NS ns2.example.org
My goal was to redirect queries to a load balancer serving foo.e
I’ve had great success using A10networks Thunder series and AX series for load
balancing dns servers, performing GSLB, and for setting up anycast addresses
for dns.
On 2016-09-14, 11:18, "bind-users on behalf of Job"
wrote:
Hello,
which is the best load balancer for two or more
Thanks, subject is all.
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
Sorry for the noise
--
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lis
Testing, please ignore.
-Dan
--
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
