?
Regards,
Ben
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
,
Ben
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hi,
How's your experience with DNSSEC while using it with caching dns and
authoritative dns ?
If we are using DNSSEC enable with caching resolver, and remote domain
is not DNSSEC enabled so in that case , do we face any problem, means
any failure or something?
Regards,
Ben
Gaurav K
/IN':
2001:500:90:1::31#53
error (network unreachable) resolving 'ns-921.amazon.com/A/IN':
2001:500:94:1::31#53
Network unreachable mean, dns can not resolve query or something in
network / firewall problem ?
some says format error and all.
Thanks,
Ben
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Hi,
Currently we using ipv4 network for our customers and all.By the way, we
do not block any ipv6 , so why we got ipv6 resolution as network
unreachable in logs?
On 10/05/12 09:47, Ben wrote:
Hi,
I just enable bind as caching name server and when watching logs i got
below erros.
It
Hi Matthew,
Sorry for late response.I enabled statistics-channel , and it gives web
based output.What is caching hit ratio filed , i mean which option /
filed tell us about how many queries comes from cache or...?
BR
Ben
On 08/05/2012 10:09, Ben wrote:
I am new with bind.I am trying to
Hi,
Any clue to resolve this.
BR
Ben
Hi Matthew,
Sorry for late response.I enabled statistics-channel , and it gives
web based output.What is caching hit ratio filed , i mean which option
/ filed tell us about how many queries comes from cache or...?
BR
Ben
On 08/05/2012 10:09, Ben wrote
Hi Warren,
I am not pointing any problem to anyone like late response or other
things, if u feel like that sorry for the same.
Actually i took time to try to find answer from myself and even try to
do it from google. But unfortunately, I am not finding proper clue.
BR,
Ben
On May 15
machine :
/usr/local/nom/bin/resperf -s 10.115.1.231 -d
/root/dnsperf_test_queries.tsv
DNS Resolution Performance Testing Tool
Nominum Version 2.0.0.0
[Status] Command line: resperf -s 10.115.1.231 -d
/root/dnsperf_test_queries.tsv
[Status] Sending
[Status] Reached 65536 outstanding queries
[St
Hello,
Any reply please...
Regards,
Ben
Hi,
I am doing load testing for bind as caching dns server.Fro that i
configure one machine as client and one as server.I setup bind as
caching dns server and set recursive-clients 3.
While doing load test from client machine via resperf, i got
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for your kind response.
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Ben wrote:
version: 9.7.3-P3-RedHat-9.7.3-8.P3.el6_2.2
CPUs found: 8
worker threads: 8
number of zones: 19
debug level: 0
xfers running: 0
xfers deferred: 0
soa queries in progress: 0
query logging is ON
recursive clients: 6400
6000-6500
, and then goes back to 0..
Is there anything remaining in bind to configure or any issue in OS?
I would request you to please suggest me to solve this.
Regards,
Ben
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for your kind response.
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Ben wrote:
version: 9.7.3-P3-RedHat-9.7.3-8.
Dear ISC Team,
Any suggestions please.
Regards,
Ben
Hi,
I tried all things to avoid current problem, but still same.Can we
have information that why bind shows "Operation canceled" error in
named.run file? and why bind does not take full power?when i do load
test and same tim
Dear ISC Team,
Any input please, if is there anything from my side, kindly suggest me.
Best Regards,
Ben
Dear ISC Team,
Any suggestions please.
Regards,
Ben
Hi,
I tried all things to avoid current problem, but still same.Can we
have information that why bind shows "Operation can
A' (in '.'?) after disabling EDNS
How to check that current bind installation has EDNS enabled or ?
what could be reason behind it? we do not disable any EDNS in
named.conf. Please suggest me to resolve it.
Bind version : BIND 9.7.3-P3-RedHat-9.7.3-8.P3.el6_2.3
Regards,
Ben
_
Hi Tony,
Thanks for your kind response. Disabling EDNS due to firewall
misconfiguration, raise any problem to DNS activity.? I mean my users
face any name resolution problesms or ...?
Is there any way that we can show that current disabling EDNS happens by
firewall issue ?
Regards,
Ben
11:47:42.731 lame-servers: info: error (operation canceled)
resolving 'technologie.gazeta.pl/A/IN': 8.8.8.8#53
10-Jul-2012 11:47:42.731 lame-servers: info: error (operation canceled)
resolving 'ns1.kasperskylabs.net/A/IN': 8.8.8.8#53
10-Jul-2012 11:47:42.732 lame-servers: info
Hi,
On Jul 10, 2012, at 2:25 AM, Ben wrote:
Hi,
We deploy BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6 and trying to do load test
while doing it we got so many erros logs in named.run.
I must admit to being a little confused…
It *looks* to me like you are forwarding all queries to 8.8.8.8? (If
misconfiguration or
something else?
If someone share his experience with it, What are the maximum QPS
handled by bind? that is good to understand more.
Regards,
Ben
Hi Ben,
At 05:37 11-07-2012, Ben wrote:
Actually, I am doing load testing with my CACHING DNS SERVER, and for
that i setup one
How to check from 10 queries, which are on cache and which are not ?
Still, my question is open..
Dear ISC team, can you please suggest what happend with my caching DNS
load test.? I mean, want to find root cause of it.
Den 12. juli 2012 kl. 01:49 skrev Ben :
If someone share his
append fresh/new named
statistics to defined fiel, is it so?
Or is there any interval for rndc / named to generate fresh/new statistics.?
Kindly correct me if I am missing something...
Regards,
Ben
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman
output from it by any command or something?
My concern is that to find QPS / no. of queries per RR / hit ratio.
Best Regards,
Ben
On Jul 18 2012, Ben wrote:
Hi,
As per man page and my understanding rndc stats writes a current
named statistics into defined file in named.conf
so suppose, if i
resource limitation or ?
BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6
Regards,
Ben
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
or link from which, we can read about rndc stats
commands in deep or any FAQ/Information about general error messages
regarding bind services.
Best Regards,
Ben
Hi,
I am monitoring rndc stats output and got
++ Resolver Statistics ++
[Common]
82121 queries aborted due to quota
king about.
Thanks,
.Ben Bridges.
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
The in-addr.arpa domain for your IP space will need to be delegated to your
DNS servers. That generally happens at the entity that assigned the block.
For instance ARIN, RIPE, or APNIC.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024, 8:06 AM wrote:
> Hello, please, I want to know if I need to delegate a range of IP
> add
@0 -x 197.242.181.69', it works. Do I need to request a
> delegation of 197.242.181.69 to the name servers ns1.sami.tn?
>
>
>
> *De :* Ben Croswell
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 14 mars 2024 13:10
> *À :* RAHAL Sami SOFRECOM ; ML BIND Users <
> bind-users@lists.isc.org>
>
We rip the logs apart put them into a database with a web front end. We
watch for 6 months then remove ones with no traffic.
On Mar 11, 2012 6:12 PM, "hugo hugoo" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is it possible to logs queries to a specific domain?
> I have a domain configured in my system but I do not kn
If you do not delegate the subdomains with NS records you are not fully
delegating the subdomain.
It will work fine in the short term, but are setting up a landmine for
someone to step on later.
If decide to move that subdomain to other dns servers later it will
disappear without the NS records.
T
If you are authoritative for a cname that points to an A elsewhere, your
server will resolve the cname and leave it to the client dns server to go
get the A from the server that hosts it.
On Mar 16, 2012 10:14 AM, "Samantha Steers" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting prepped to migrate dns from one ser
The TC flag is set when the response is larger than your max udp packet
size. 512 bytes with no edns0 and up to 4096 bytes with edns0 fully
functioning.
On Apr 10, 2012 9:55 AM, "rams" wrote:
> When I get TC flag for UDP query?
>
> ___
> Please visit ht
What you are asking for can't be done.
If you load the google.com zone everything you don't load in the zone will
be black holed and not resolve.
If you try to load WWW.Google.com you will not be able to make WWW a cname
due to the no cname and other data rule.
On Apr 15, 2012 5:39 PM, "Tobias Kra
+mhuff=ox@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-
> > bounces+mhuff=ox@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Giese
> > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:50 AM
> > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> > Subject: Re: Configuring CNAME for nosslsearch.google.com
> >
> > On 4/1
You set a listen-on that does not include 127.0.0.1.
On Apr 22, 2012 11:08 PM, "David Milholen" wrote:
> I am a Wisp admin and I have just configured a couple of new Bind9
> servers.
> They will resolve using dig google.com @9x.1xx.104.14
> I am having some trouble getting them to answer themsel
A certain percentage of queries will always go to all of the forwarders
listed.
If you have servers A B and C and A is the fastest SRTT, whenever A answers
the SRTT for B and C will be decremented by a small percentage. Eventually
they will be lower than A and get used. The likely result is that t
than you are loading it as.
You load 104.16.98.in-addr.arpa. they are transferring
104-22.16.98.in-addr.arpa.
-Ben Croswell
On May 2, 2012 1:18 PM, "David" wrote:
> **
> Hello All,
> I am new here but have been watching the list for a while.
> I run a small WISP and we ha
gation the
subdomain will disappear.
-Ben Croswell
On May 7, 2012 1:08 PM, "M. Meadows" wrote:
>
> So ... if we have
>
> exacttarget.com delegated to ns1 and ns2.exacttarget.com nameservers
>
> and ... we manage the s6.exacttarget.com zone file from ns1 and
> ns2.exactt
The child doesn't know it's parent and goes up to the root like any other
server would.
-Ben Croswell
On May 8, 2012 2:13 PM, "Mike Bernhardt" wrote:
> Reading the section on delegation in the O'Reilly book, I'm confused about
> something: The parent is con
Another option would be zone level forwarding on the child to point at the
parent or stub zones.
-Ben Croswell
On May 8, 2012 3:59 PM, "Mike Bernhardt" wrote:
> In this case, the root only knows the external public server, not the
> internal parent who is doing the delegating.
x27;s the method for retrying a forwarder after it was set high due to a
timeout etc.
-Ben Croswell
On Jul 25, 2012 2:36 PM, "ip admin" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anybody there who can provide a definitive answer on the current BIND 9.7
> (or higher) global forwarder behaviour?
>
&
on.
I assume the logic is, why would I forward a subdomain I know doesn't exist.
-Ben Croswell
On Oct 26, 2012 2:17 AM, "Frank Even" wrote:
> I've recently had an issue that I'm having some issues finding
> information on solving.
>
> I have internal DNS resolver
The thing that brings me back to a delegation issue is the statement of
slaving an external version of the second level domain the internal DNS
server. I know if I was splitting a domain I would not put internal only
delegations external.
-Ben Croswell
On Oct 26, 2012 7:23 AM, "Sten Ca
I did digs to both names from my work DNS infrastructure. The response was
58ms to resolve the WWW entry and 44ms for the non WWW entry. Would not
appear to be a resolution related slow down.
-Ben Croswell
On Nov 26, 2012 1:25 PM, "Lightner, Jeff" wrote:
> For question 1:
>
It is probably related to forward first versus forward only. Forward first
is default but will fall back to no forwarding if the forwarders fail.
On Dec 7, 2012 12:06 PM, "Romgo" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently running two bind9 server on Debian Squeeze.
> 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze8
>
> Server 1
My first thought would be lack of firewall rules and connectivity to the
Internet.
On Jan 8, 2013 9:35 AM, "Daniele" wrote:
> If I use BIND9 forwarding all the queries not belonging to my local zones,
> it works.
>
> But if I don't forward those queries, `dig` sometimes (and this is weird)
> fail
There is no issue with a configuration like this. It is the very definition
of a stealth master and is a very common configuration. Any DDNS updates
will continue to reach the stealth master via the mname and no resolvers
will find the master via NS records so it won't be queried.
On Jan 16, 2013 3
If you load the zone your server will believe it knows everything about the
zone and not forward anything below it.
If you load foo.com with two records, nothing but those two records will
ever resolve on that server for foo.com.
One way to make it work would be to load two zones. Vpn1.foo.com an
A common issue is the secondary not being allowed to query the master for
the SOA of the zone. Ensure the master has an allow-query that includes the
secondary.
On Jan 25, 2013 6:06 AM, "Jan-Piet Mens" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm seeing quite a number of messages like
>
> xfer-out: debug 3: c
You need to ensure if the resolver that is doing the forwarding also loads
the blank 10/8 that you have the smaller /24 delegated in the 10/8.
The reason being if it loads the /8 with no /24 delegation it will ignore
the forward because it believes the /24 doesn't exist.
On Feb 21, 2013 1:21 PM, "N
A server will not forward a zone it is also authoritative for.
On Mar 28, 2013 3:33 PM, "Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS)" <
tal.ben-elie...@its.ny.gov> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ** **
>
> My organization is evaluating the use of split-view DNS in our environment.
>
>
Bryan
>
>
> ___
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
&g
The basic answer is that you use null forwarders for any domains that you
want to turn off the global forwarders.
If you have a global forwarder and then you have bob.com with a null
forwarder, bob.com and the domains below is will follow delegation.
On Dec 11, 2013 7:10 AM, "Bob McDonald" wrote:
A freshly started server with no cache will be directed to nd1 first which
will give a referral to ns2 for the subdomain. After that it will go to ns2
directly until the ns records time out in cache.
On Jan 23, 2014 12:30 PM, "Blason R" wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> I may sound like novice but have
You can't modify cache. If that was allowed you could cache poison any
domain you wanted.
On Feb 14, 2014 8:52 AM, "houguanghua" wrote:
> Hi all,
> Bind provides rndc tools to operate the cache. But how to change a record
> in the cache. For example:
> to modify origin record " *www.abc.com*
What you say is true, but the OP wasn't clear in who owned the record he
wanted to override. I assumed it was someone else's or you would just
change authoritative source that you own.
On Feb 14, 2014 10:20 AM, "Barry Margolin" wrote:
> In article ,
> Ben Croswe
I guess I am missing why anyone on the internet should be able to open
queries against your caching resolver.
Why would in bound queries be allowed to servers that are for your people
to get out?
On Feb 27, 2014 10:13 AM, "Ivo" wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> We observed that similar requests are landi
Ah I see you are in provider situation. Shows my assumption you were in an
enclosed enterprise environment.
On Feb 27, 2014 10:57 AM, "Ivo" wrote:
> Ben,
>
> No, our server is not an open resolver, we have a large user community
> and the problem is that users install t
RTT banding was removed in early versions of 9.8 due to the performance hit
being larger than any security benefit.
So it would depend what version of bind is being used in this case.
https://www.isc.org/blogs/rtt-banding-removal-from-bind-9/
It is important to note that all ns records will take s
back to being slower.
On Mar 3, 2014 8:24 AM, "houguanghua" wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> What's the meaning of bind "decaying"? Where can I find the detailed
> description? Thanks!
>
> Guanghua
>
>
> ----
> Date
I would imagine your issue is a lack of an NS delegation in the root zone
you are slaving. If you load a parent and then try to forward a child of
that parent you must have a delegation in the parent. The delegation
doesn't have to match the forwarders but it must exist.
On Mar 25, 2014 1:57 PM, "
Cisco routers do have the ability to "doctor" DNS packets when doing NAT.
When it doctors it sets the TTL to 0 but I dont know why it would only do
it on CNAME records.
On Jun 5, 2014 12:43 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
> Am 05.06.2014 17:58, schrieb /dev/rob0:
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 05:21:
The default for allow query is local host local nets. Basically the server
itself and directly connected networks
On Sep 29, 2014 8:03 PM, "Bill Christensen"
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Something got sideways on one of my DNS servers, and I would appreciate
> some help in figuring out what's going o
Is it safe to say the only vulnerable hosts would be those accepting
queries from the outside world, or would this also pertain servers getting
responses from the outside world with no inbound queries?
On Jul 28, 2015 5:42 PM, "Michael McNally" wrote:
> As the security incident manager for this
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 07:06:16PM -0400, Ben Croswell wrote:
> > Is it safe to say the only vulnerable hosts would be those
> > accepting queries from the outside world, or would this also
> > pertain servers getting responses from the outside world with
> > no inboun
Cyber folks asked if there was any way for the DNS servers to "protect" the
vulnerable clients.
The only thing i could see from the explanation was disabling or limiting
edns0 sizes. That is obviously not a long term option.
On Feb 17, 2016 11:39 AM, "Alan Clegg" wrote:
> On 2/17/16, 11:34 AM,
for all five records to 300 (or more
specifically, the TTL of the first one of the RRs in the file). I looked for a
BIND directive in the manual to change this behavior but could find no obvious
candidate.
Thanks,
Ben Bridges
Springfield, MO
___
P
longer TTL for most records
(including other TXT records) in order to reduce the query load on our servers.
It would be nice to be able to set a short TTL for the Office 365 record but a
longer TTL for other TXT records for the same domain name.
Thanks,
Ben
From: bind-users-boun...@lis
I tend to agree with you about the overloading of TXT records.
Thanks,
Ben
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ray Bellis
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:22 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re
BIND
ii libbind9-90 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.8 amd64
BIND9 Shared Library used by BIND
Any idea's what I'm missing here?
Thanks!
Ben
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to uns
Uh, user error. Turns out they aren't created until the server actually
received requests.
I started testing the server for completeness, and the records started
showing up!
In any case:
statistics-channels {
inet * port 8053 allow { any; };
};
Thanks!
Ben
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:
They go over this in the YT video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRbAigV2byE
It might not give you a total insight on how to configure it
step-by-step but enough
On 08/06/2020 06:13, ShubhamGoyal wrote:
Dear all,
I want to ask about bind
DoH Impl
The terminology is fairly misleading, as in the slave is not doing the
work on-behalf of or instruction of the the master. But there is ways
for the master to influence the slaves; such as "allow-transfer".
I don't see the big issue with making a terminology change in this case.
On 15/06/2020
Some servers already do
Regards
Ben Lavender
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:02 DeCaro, James John (Jim) CIV DISA FE (USA) via
bind-users, wrote:
> Or you can call the slave servers 'secondary' servers.
>
>
> V/R
> Jim DeCaro
> DISA
> Systems Administrator
> Windows
In this case a zone level forwarder takes priority over the global
forwarder. Abc.com would go to 1.1.1.1
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 11:44 PM baalchina wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a bind 9.16.4 as recursive name server. I want to forward all
> queries to a specific dns server out of my net such as 8.8
If you uncomment that mg CNAME you end up with a CNAME mx and TXT at the
same node in to the DNS tree and that is illegal. That is why you get the
error "cname and other data". The mx and txt are the other data.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 8:19 PM Jukka Pakkanen wrote:
> Cannot figure out what is wron
Hi,
Without having to alter the TTL of the existing RRs as well as the
default TTL. I know this can be done using cache-max-ttl to limit the
whole cache, but can this be done for say one single or multiple defined
domains only?
Thanks
___
Please v
Anyone think they may know the answer to this?
Thanks
Ben
On 07/09/2020 23:00, Ben Lavender wrote:
Hi,
Without having to alter the TTL of the existing RRs as well as the
default TTL. I know this can be done using cache-max-ttl to limit the
whole cache, but can this be done for say one
Thanks, yes the second is actually the aim. We don't have secondaries
since we use ADDS and BIND simply acts as a recursive service for the
other internal domains.
On 10/09/2020 16:01, Carl Byington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 15:35 +0100
Does BIND take advantage of net.core.rmem_max on Linux boxes?
If I set the rmem_max to 12.5mb but leave the rmem_default as the OS
default will I see a benefit on a high QPS DNS server?
Or does BIND look to the rmem_default and ignore the rmem_max?
--
-Ben Croswell
Are you loading the parent domain and trying to zone forward a child domain
on the same DNS server? I.e. loading somedomain.local and trying to forward
ab.somedomain.local
If so an NS delegation is required in every instance I have done in my
environment. The NS doesn't need to be "right" but it n
subscribe
> from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
> subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more
> information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listin
I would concur that internally Anycast is best for client facing edge nodes
to reduce client configuration complexity as well as reducing impact of a
first resolver outage.
On Sun, May 8, 2022, 7:59 AM Tony Finch wrote:
> Bob McDonald wrote:
> >
> > My question is this; how do the recursive ser
b McDonald wrote:
> Thanks for the answers. A couple more questions and then I'll stand down.
>
> First, it's Ben Croswell. Just pointing that out.
>
> Second, my reading of the definition of a static-stub zone in the Bvarm
> indicates that its use is to allow a local
I will say edge DNS servers reduce client config complexity, even if you
have DHCP, and increase resiliency of the initial resolver.
Where it's true with DHCP you can change the DHCP server options it doesn't
help if someone just got a 4 day lease and then the DNS server dies.
Additionally the ab
Any logs?
Regards
Ben Lavender
On Mon, 23 May 2022, 21:52 Lefteris Tsintjelis via bind-users, <
bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> I must be missing something. Any ideas why does it fail? Everything
> seems normal. Works well with Windows 2016. Downgrading to 9.16 works
> agai
uch appreciated. If this is not the proper forum for this posting, please
point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
Ben Bridges
[City Utilities]
[SpringNet]<http://www.springnet.net>
Sales 417.575.7000 | Support 417.874.8000 |
springnet.net<http://www.springnet.net>
--
Visit
Ubuntu 20.04.5 is LTS and BIND 9.16 is the current stable ESV release, so
they’re both still fully supported (and fully patched).
Thanks,
Ben Bridges
From: bind-users On Behalf Of John Thurston
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 2:32 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1
From: Emmanuel Fusté
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:22 PM
To: Ben Bridges ; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash
Current ESV : 9.16.35
No, your release is not patched.
Add the ISC PPA repo and install the latest ESV. ISC PPA packaged are packaged
by the same maintainers
It looks like that issue was occurring in a different part of the netmgr code
and was fixed 8 months ago.
Thanks,
Ben Bridges
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Andrew Latham
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 2:35 PM
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash
I see
https
When you say “ISC packages”, are you referring to the packages in the
ppa:isc/bind repository on launchpad?
Ben Bridges
From: Ondřej Surý
Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 12:26 AM
To: Ben Bridges
Cc: Emmanuel Fusté ; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash
In fact, it’s as
This is exactly what we have done in the past to mitigate malware. Just
load somebaddomain.com with no A records or with a wildcard pointing to
127.0.0.1.
--
-Ben Croswell
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Baird, Josh wrote:
> You could just create an authoritative zone for the domain
Are there NS records and/or zone forwarding for the 10.131.10.0?
If there is the servers will look to the most specfic domain.
--
-Ben Croswell
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Todd Snyder wrote:
> Good day,
>
> We are working on an odd issue. I can provide more detail as necessa
directory shows .COM.
I was wondering if anyone had experienced an issue like this.
And I understand both of those version are ancient and need to be removed
from the environment.
--
-Ben Croswell
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
I've always assumed that the ";..." line in the example zone file right
after the SOA record and the (...) in the SOA record itself meant that
such information about the parent zone 2.0.192.in-addr.arpa had been
intentionally left out for the sake of brevity and clarity.
Ben Br
Since you are digging @127.0.0.1, I can't tell for sure on which server you are
performing the dig. But based on the responses, I'd say you were performing
the dig on d62.test.net. d62 is authoritative for 168.192.in-addr.arpa but not
for 0/16.168.192.in-addr.arpa. (The NS record for 0/16.168
He states in his messasge that he only wants to change one host in the
domain and that all other information for the domain needs to remain intact.
If he loads or forwards the domain on his servers nothing other than what he
loads will be resolved.
--
-Ben Croswell
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:24
records.
You will need to make example.com an A record or use www.example.com IN
CNAME someother.site.com.
--
-Ben Croswell
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Dhaval Thakar <
dhaval.tha...@networthdirect.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using bind 9.6.0.
>
> I want to co
ial meaning or further
processing is associated with it (hence implying that it is ok if that
domain-name is defined as a CNAME somewhere else in the domain space).
Is that not the case? Is there some other part of the DNS specification
that forbids it?
Ben Bridges
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantom
When Section 5.1 of RFC 5321 says "If a CNAME record is found, the
resulting name is processed as if it were the initial name", it is
referring to the situation where a query is sent for the MX record for
xyz.com, and instead of an MX record being returned for xyz.com, a CNAME
record is returned fo
What specifically are you intending to wildcard? "com."? "net."? "."?
If so, then you would be implicitly making your name servers
authoritative for domains for which your servers are not supposed to be
authoritative.
Ben Bridges
> -Original Mes
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo