Hello, All,
This lately we have been receiving complain from our customer that domains
"b2bdr.fransib2corp.com www.fransitadawul.com.sa www.fransiplus.com" are
unable to resolve from our DNS server whereas it can be resolve from all
over the world
FYI, my name servers are as listed b
Can you post full output of the following dig commands ran on one of your
nameservers:
dig www.franisplus.com
dig +trace www.franisplus.com
Steve
On 21 July 2013 10:55, Ejaz wrote:
> ** ** **
>
> Hello, All,
>
> ** **
>
> This lately we have been receiving complain from our customer th
oops, typo...
dig www.fransiplus.com
dig +trace www.fransiplus.com
On 21 July 2013 11:09, Steven Carr wrote:
> Can you post full output of the following dig commands ran on one of your
> nameservers:
>
> dig www.franisplus.com
> dig +trace www.franisplus.com
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> On 21 July 2013
Thank you so much.
Let me tell you, it resolve from the server without any problem, but when
I tried to resolve these domain from my PC by using the ns1.nesma.net.sa
which I can't
how ever as you said, the below is the output of dig. Nslookup etc..
>From the server, it is ok
Can you resolve other websites using ns1.nesma.net.sa from your PC or is it
just these few sites that you can't resolve? Are you able to share your
BIND configuration?
Steve
On 21 July 2013 11:24, Ejaz wrote:
> ** ** **
>
> Thank you so much.
>
> ** **
>
> Let me tell you, it resolve fro
Thanks you once again for your quick response.
Yes, I can resolve all other webistes without any problems. As well as
requested, find the attached only main the configuration file,
Ejaz
_
acl trusted { 92.48.0.0/18; 212.119.65.0/24; 212.71.32.0/19; 213.181
So the logs would seem to indicate that the server responded to your PC, the
only way you can see exactly what happened with that response is with traffic
captures on the name server and your PC.
Steve
On 21 Jul 2013, at 12:52, "Ejaz" wrote:
I can resolve yahoo and here the snippet of lo
In my opinion your 'listen-on' options should be changed from "212.71.32.19" to
"any".
i wish that can help you.
--
T. KITTIRATANACHAI
From: sjc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: resolving-problem
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 13:09:24 +0100
To: me...@cyberia.net.sa
CC: bind-users@lists.isc.org
So the logs
On 21 July 2013 13:42, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai wrote:
> In my opinion your 'listen-on' options should be changed from
> "212.71.32.19" to "any".
>
Actually I would disagree with that. There may be a very good reason that
BIND is configured to listen on a specific IP address, the server may be
m
As I had resolve the IP address, the "212.71.32.19" which has configured is
point to "ns1.nesma.net.sa".
That seem that the DNS Server will listen only on itself, i think that the
configuration file also came from the `ns1` too. I'm not sure about this. Can
you explain me for further knowledge i
On 21 July 2013 14:24, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai wrote:
> As I had resolve the IP address, the "212.71.32.19" which has configured
> is point to "ns1.nesma.net.sa".
> That seem that the DNS Server will listen only on itself, i think that the
> configuration file also came from the `ns1` too. I'm n
On 21.07.13 12:55, Ejaz wrote:
This lately we have been receiving complain from our customer that domains
"b2bdr.fransib2corp.com www.fransitadawul.com.sa www.fransiplus.com" are
unable to resolve from our DNS server whereas it can be resolve from all
over the world
FYI, my name servers are a
I just started noticing these in my log:
7/21/13 11:33:13 PM named[355] 21-Jul-2013 23:33:13.646 general:
warning: zone domain.com/IN: 'domain.com' found SPF/TXT record but no SPF/SPF
record found, add matching type SPF record
The zone does have an SPF record. I'm not sure I understan
In message , SH
Development writes:
> I just started noticing these in my log:
>
> 7/21/13 11:33:13 PM named[355] 21-Jul-2013 23:33:13.646 general:
> warning: zone domain.com/IN: 'domain.com' found S
> PF/TXT record but no SPF/SPF record found, add matching type SPF record
>
> The zone
It's exactly as it says...
Instead of
... TXT "SPF ..."
You now do
... SPF "SPF ..."
--
Jason Hellenthal
Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176
JJH48-ARIN
On Jul 22, 2013, at 0:48, SH Development wrote:
> I just started noticing these in my log:
>
> 7/21/13 11:33:13
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 02:51 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> It's exactly as it says...
>
>
> Instead of
> ... TXT "SPF ..."
>
>
> You now do
>
>
> ... SPF "SPF ..."
>
>
Mark Andrews wrote:
No. It has a legacy SPF TXT record. It SHOULD have record of
type SPF as per RFC 4408.
Named w
Basically a SPF record type in place that's new but you could carry both for
new and older clients.
--
Jason Hellenthal
Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
Voice: +1 (616) 953-0176
JJH48-ARIN
On Jul 22, 2013, at 0:48, SH Development wrote:
> I just started noticing these in my log:
>
> 7/21/
17 matches
Mail list logo
