On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 02:51 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > It's exactly as it says... > > > Instead of > ... TXT "SPF ..." > > > You now do > > > ... SPF "SPF ..." > >
Mark Andrews wrote: No. It has a legacy SPF TXT record. It SHOULD have record of type SPF as per RFC 4408. Named will complain if both types are not present. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
