GoDaddy supports everything you're looking for.
Doug
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Mark & Alexander,
On Monday, 2013-02-18 08:43:32 +1100,
Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message
> ,
> Alexander Gurvitz writes:
> > Is there any practical difference between the following two:
> >
> > 1.
> > example.com. NS ns1.example.com.
> > example.com. NS ns2.example.com.
> > ns1.example.com.
On 19 Feb 2013, at 08:06, Doug Barton wrote:
> GoDaddy supports everything you're looking for.
Though you might prefer to use a less repulsive provider.
http://kottke.org/11/12/the-internets-go-daddy-issues
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
___
Shane,
> Yes, we had discovered and fixed this in the master branch (patch
> attached). Apologies for the brokenness!
I've applied that, and it does indeed look better, but not good enough :)
See screen shot [1]. No worries, though: I'll wait until you release
(and I'm more looking forward to yo
Hi there,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Vernon Schryver wrote:
...
Recently I moved this domain(lcrcomputer.net) to a registrar that
suports DNSSEC and inserted the DS record for this domain. I checked
DNSSEC via http://dnsviz.net and
http://dnssec-debugger.verisignlabs.com. Both show DNSSEC is
> I've applied that, and it does indeed look better, but not good enough :)
> See screen shot [1]. No worries, though: I'll wait until you release
> (and I'm more looking forward to your implementing the JSON suggestion I
> sent over... ;-)
That just means there's no data to graph yet. Send your s
On 2/18/2013 23:20, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 19.02.13 10:25, Noel Butler wrote:
One thing I need to point out, your SOA timings seem extreme...
refresh 86400 drop that to 3h
retry 3600, drop to 900
I don't see the reason for doing these, unless NOTIFY does not work,
but in
such cas
Just be sure that WHEN your master dies, the slaves will stay
authoritative for long enough that you can get the master up without
working night shift.
On 19/02/13 21:17, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2/18/2013 23:20, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 19.02.13 10:25, Noel Butler wrote:
>>> One thing I
> From: Tony Finch
> > GoDaddy supports everything you're looking for.
>
> Though you might prefer to use a less repulsive provider.
> http://kottke.org/11/12/the-internets-go-daddy-issues
Those issues seem at most secondary to the objections some people have
to how GoDaddy has dealt with the In
On 2/19/2013 16:30, Vernon Schryver wrote:
My experience wrestling the domains of relatives from GoDaddy was
not as bad as some of the stories, but it took more time, effort,
and sophistication than some people would care or be able to muster.
They still use deceptive tricks to keep domains hos
I started to prepend my statement with "Some people don't like GoDaddy,
but ..." and then decided I would hope that it wouldn't be necessary at
this point. Since this is unarguably off-topic, I will try to be brief.
First, a certain percentage of all customer service interactions with
every co
Robert Moskowitz said:
> Delving further into my challenges.
>
> But they don't seem to support DNSSEC protected domains, and even
> IPv6 glue records are special requests, it seems.
I would like to know how can I handle DNSSEC key rollovers without
manually entering keys into one of those annoy
> That just means there's no data to graph yet. Send your server a few
> queries and try it again.
Duh. Didn't occur to me, because I was looking for the list of
authoritative zones served by named.
Other than that, the output looks very sexy.
(Are people really interested in the 'Tasks' list?
13 matches
Mail list logo
