Re: question about CNAME

2009-03-12 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:32:35PM +0800, tzq tang wrote a message of 132 lines which said: > > I think I should explain the question more clearly, You need first to learn about email. The "superior to" sign > is here to *quote* what you respond to. Do not use it for your own text or it will

Re: XFR quota setting?

2009-03-12 Thread Chris Thompson
On Mar 11 2009, Niall O'Reilly wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:41 -0500, Peter Laws wrote: Seriously, though, what is the default quota and is it actually configurable? Sorry. No idea what or whether. RTFM time for us both! 8-) Which ought to take less than the time to post here :-( opt

Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread My Name
Is this possible with 9.6.0-P1 or do I need to change the code (all ideas where to start are welcome, I haven't looked at the code yet). I want to setup a forwarder and each incoming query (in fact only A or ) should be sent to two different upstream servers. Joe _

Re: question about CNAME

2009-03-12 Thread Sten Carlsen
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:32:35PM +0800, > tzq tang wrote > a message of 132 lines which said: > > >>> I think I should explain the question more clearly, >>> > > You need first to learn about email. The "superior to" sign > is here > to *quote* what yo

Re: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread R Dicaire
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:43 AM, My Name wrote: > I want to setup a forwarder and each incoming query (in fact only A or ) > should be sent to two different upstream servers. Why? ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.is

RE: XFR quota setting?

2009-03-12 Thread Laws, Peter C.
On Mar 11 2009, Niall O'Reilly wrote: >On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:41 -0500, Peter Laws wrote: >> Seriously, though, what is the default quota and is it actually >> configurable? > > Sorry. No idea what or whether. RTFM time for us both! 8-) Which ought to take less than the time to post here :-(

Re: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread Gregory Hicks
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:44 +0200 > Subject: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query > From: My Name > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > > Is this possible with 9.6.0-P1 or do I need to change the code (all > ideas where to start are welcome, I haven't looked at the code yet). > > I want

Re: XFR quota setting?

2009-03-12 Thread Peter Laws
Chris Thompson wrote: If it's occurring a lot, you could have stuck or nearly-stuck transfers going on. "rndc status" will tell you how many. You may need to adjust "max-transfer-time-out"/"max-transfer-idle-out" rather than "transfers-out". Fiddled with the transfer-* settings and made the qu

Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Peter Laws
Our environment includes a couple of AD servers. They serve DNS to PCs using AD (but not all PCs). They allow DDNS for clients and slave the rest of our environment's zones. For some reason, they *forward* every other query to us, but never mind that. Look it up your own damn ... well, never

Re: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <200903121454.n2cesvel019...@metis.hicks-net.net>, Gregory Hicks wri tes: > > > Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:44 +0200 > > Subject: Two outgoing queries for each incoming query > > From: My Name > > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org > > > > Is this possible with 9.6.0-P1 or do I need to ch

Re: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Kevin Darcy
Peter Laws wrote: Our environment includes a couple of AD servers. They serve DNS to PCs using AD (but not all PCs). They allow DDNS for clients and slave the rest of our environment's zones. For some reason, they *forward* every other query to us, but never mind that. Look it up your own damn

RE: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Bridges
> If I dump the delegation and make an MX record in the master, mail will be > OK, but then no one can query records in that zone because it's not > actually delegated unless they point at MS-DNS. Is there a reason why you can't point all of your internal hosts (AD and non-AD) at your AD's for re

Re: question about CNAME

2009-03-12 Thread tzq tang
thanks for your response.I do this test between two intranet machine and each of them has a local IP.10.0.0.13,additionally the both domain are in the same DNS SERVER 10.0.0.13 ,the zone file as follows: ZONE 1: $ORIGIN . $TTL 86400 ; 1 day test.comIN SOA test.com. www.test.co

Re: Trouble publishing dkim via nsupdate

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20090313031347.ga19...@csy.ca>, Shane W writes: > Hey all, > > I am trying to publish a dkim record in a signed dynamic > zone using nsupdate. My query looks like the below but > nsupdate is having none of it, giving formerr. Can anyone > see an obvious error with this query: Pasti

Re: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Kevin Darcy
You mean, other than the fact that MS-DNS is an inferior DNS implementation and, as pointed out in the original post, would need to forward all queries for names outside of the AD zones?

RE: question about CNAME

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Bridges
What is not working? Are you not getting the CNAME record for email.test.com? Are you not getting the A record for email.tzqian.com? Are both zones on the same dns server, or is each zone on a separate server? Which server are you querying, and from what device are you issuing the query?

rDNS for /20

2009-03-12 Thread Jeff Lasman
I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more . I'm trying to set up a reverse delegation to two nameservers for a /20. Netmask is 255.255.240.0 (I th

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <200903122311.24920.bli...@nobaloney.net>, Jeff Lasman writes: > I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and > I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three > years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more . > > I'm trying to set

Re: rDNS for /20

2009-03-12 Thread Doug Barton
Jeff Lasman wrote: > I've read the relevant parts of DNS and Bind over and over again, and > I'm still going crazy. I've searched this list going back about three > years. I've googled. Each step confuses me more . It would help if you described in more detail what you've tried, and what is c