Dumping running config/named.conf

2009-03-04 Thread Todd Snyder
Good morning, We utilize a number of include files as part of our named.conf. I am looking to see if there is a clever way to dump the entire named.conf (or, even better, the entire RUNNING named.conf), which includes all the include files. I say running config, because sometimes you do an rndc

Re: Dumping running config/named.conf

2009-03-04 Thread Mark Andrews
bin/tests/cfg_test --named /etc/named.conf In message <1d8c9a4471119a40bd574f9d8d464ae304bd3...@xch60ykf.rim.net>, "Todd S nyder" writes: > Good morning, > > We utilize a number of include files as part of our named.conf. I am > looking to see if there is a clever way to dump the entire

$generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Takahiro Masuda
Hi I was trying to get the $generate directive to work like so 11 IN PTR 14.cool.com. 30 IN PTR 33.cool.com. $GENERATE 11-30 ${3,0,d} PTR $.COOL.COM. I've read the manual here http://www.bind9.net/manual/bind/9.3.2/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#id2566761--- Syntax: $GENERATE range lhs [ttl] [clas

Re: $generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Takahiro Masuda wrote: >The tricky part is ${3,0,d} waas not working. I bumped into a site > that stated $GENERATE range rhs type lhs That is wrong. > I then tried $GENERATE 11-30 $ PTR ${3,0,d}.COOL.COM. and this > worked. > Anybody here have the ability to update the man

Re: $generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <1e4079388e04544fa3ffa6a900d6fb65015d7...@exchange.vplsnet.net>, "Ta kahiro Masuda" writes: > Hi I was trying to get the $generate directive to work like so=20 > > 11 IN PTR 14.cool.com. > > > > 30 IN PTR 33.cool.com. > > $GENERATE 11-30 ${3,0,d} PTR $.COOL.COM. Which

Re: $generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Kevin Darcy
Jeremy, I don't think the definitions of "rhs" and "lhs" are at issue. What apparently led the original poster to the wrong solution initially was the verbiage in the manual stating "Any single *$* symbols within the *lhs* side are replaced by the iterator value", which implies that "$" replac

Re: $generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <49af42f8.9070...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes: > Jeremy, > I don't think the definitions of "rhs" and "lhs" are at issue. What > apparently led the original poster to the wrong solution initially was > the verbiage in the manual stating "Any single *$* symbols within the > *lhs

Re: $generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Kevin Darcy
Mark Andrews wrote: In message <49af42f8.9070...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes: Jeremy, I don't think the definitions of "rhs" and "lhs" are at issue. What apparently led the original poster to the wrong solution initially was the verbiage in the manual stating "Any single *$* symbols w

bind 9.6.0-P1's nsupdate dumps core on NetBSD/i386 4.x

2009-03-04 Thread Ray Phillips
I've built bind 9.6.0-P1 on NetBSD/i386 machines (versions 3.1, 4.0, 4.0.1 and 5.0_RC2) and discovered that nsupdate dumps core on the 4.x ones. The build process was just: % sh -c './configure --disable-threads > configure.log 2>&1' % sh -c 'make > make.log 2>&1' % su Password: # sh -c 'make

RE: $generate lhs problem. Manual needs to be updated.

2009-03-04 Thread Takahiro Masuda
Yes I guess I didn't understand it totally because in the example syntax is shown as lhs defined at the beginning $GENERATE range lhs [ttl] [class] type rhs [ comment ] and when you read the explanation for lhs it shows the example ${-20,3,d}. So I thought that ${-20,3,d} should be defined on the