I have multiple views:
internal
external
localhost
Is it possible instead of seeing this in the logs:
31-Jan-2009 08:27:47.458 client 127.0.0.1#44632: view localhost: query:
_policy._domainkey.lists.isc.org IN TXT +
31-Jan-2009 08:28:22.506 client 192.168.0.55#33380: view internal: query:
p34.
What?!
And all this time I just assumed it was the Martian Sand variety that
was being spoken of on all the "save the whales" bumper stickers.
Maybe Al will end up winning the Darwin Award for another one of his
avante garde ideas. He'll decide that the conventional wisdom that
exhausting his
The basic argument that because it can be misused, abused, criminally
exploited, etc., it should be abolished, not permitted, and deemed "illegal"
by a group of people who should not have that authority, even though it has
practical and beneficial uses is absurd. By that same logic automobile
If I am trolling, that would make you a sucker/trash fish. Was the bait tasty?
That sentence does not make sense.
- Original Message -
From: Noel Butler
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX
And you would be one of those going to your grave still insisting that the
world is still flat. I sure there where many who thought similarly with it
was being presented that the world was not flat.
- Original Message -
From: "Danny Thomas"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 11:17
And what business of yours would it be if I did? That is pretty much the
point here. What business is it of yours, ISC, or anyone else if I chose to
run my DNS with MX's pointing to CNAMES? If it is a "bad" practice, fine so
be it. But it has practical and beneficial uses. For ISC to deem
Hi,
My first posting here! :)
I have installed the Bind9 DNS server into an Debian (Ubuntu 8.04)
server. I manged to make it work for all the computers that belongs to
the same subnet, at a real internet IP subnet (not a private IP like 192
etc). It is also not behind a firewall. I have entered th
On 31-Jan-2009, at 13:18, Al Stu wrote:
And what business of yours would it be if I did? That is pretty
much the point here. What business is it of yours, ISC, or anyone
else if I chose to run my DNS with MX's pointing to CNAMES? If it
is a "bad" practice, fine so be it. But it has p
On 31-Jan-2009, at 13:24, Peter Privat wrote:
My question:
Is it possible for my friends out there somewhere in cybespace to
also use my DNS server by entering its IP their DNS settings?
So far I haven't managed to make it work. If another computer
somewhere out there in the cloud is ente
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 04:08, Al Stu wrote:
>
> If I am trolling, that would make you a sucker/trash fish. Was the
> bait tasty?
>
> That sentence does not make sense.
>
it does, i love to go fishing when i'm bored, and are so full of it
you're everywhere in the lil pond.
I have not read
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 04:05, Al Stu wrote:
> The basic argument that because it can be misused, abused, criminally
> exploited, etc., it should be abolished, not permitted, and deemed "illegal"
> by a group of people who should not have that authority, even though it has
> practical and benefic
11 matches
Mail list logo
