Re: Using 2 CPUs with BIND

Mike Diggins wrote: I noticed that when BIND 9.2.4 on Redhat Linux (Intel x86) starts, the log records: dns1 named[28513]: starting BIND 9.2.4 -u named -t /var/named/chroot dns1 named[28513]: using 2 CPUs When I start BIND on my Solaris 10 SPARC dual CPU (V210) system 9.4.2-P2, I don't get t

zone transfer problem

Hi, I try to add slave dns server. But there is a problem about zone transfer. If I don't edit manually slave server's named.conf file, zone files don't transfer from master to slave. log file at slave dns is; 02-Jan-2009 16:40:03.226 notify: client 192.168.117.50#63516: received notify for

Re: zone transfer problem

Sener ATAS escreveu: Hi, I try to add slave dns server. But there is a problem about zone transfer. If I don't edit manually slave server's named.conf file, zone files don't transfer from master to slave. log file at slave dns is; 02-Jan-2009 16:40:03.226 notify: client 192.168.117.50#635

Re: zone transfer problem

On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães < leolis...@solutti.com.br> wrote: > > > Sener ATAS escreveu: > >> Hi, >> >> I try to add slave dns server. But there is a problem about zone transfer. >> If I don't edit manually slave server's named.conf file, zone files don't >> trans

Re: Using 2 CPUs with BIND

Thanks. Would this imply it has detected multiple CPUs? I still don't see any mention of it in my logs. digg...@newblack<~># /usr/bin/ps -Lp `pgrep named` PID LWP TTYLTIME CMD 605 1 ? 0:00 named 605 2 ? 0:09 named 605 3 ? 0:06 nam

Re: Using 2 CPUs with BIND

Mike Diggins wrote: Thanks. Would this imply it has detected multiple CPUs? I still don't see any mention of it in my logs. The below output does indicated that you have five threads. I'm not sure why your log is not showing the message. Double check the log configuration and check /var/adm

openssl alert when 9.8i installed?

Hi All: I downloaded 9.6.0 and ran ./configure --with-openssl and received the warning that I should have 9.8d or better installed. I went ahead and updated to 9.8i and confirmed that it was running, but when I run configure I still get the error? Is the error "informational" or is there a p

Re: Using 2 CPUs with BIND

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Stacey Jonathan Marshall wrote: Mike Diggins wrote: Thanks. Would this imply it has detected multiple CPUs? I still don't see any mention of it in my logs. The below output does indicated that you have five threads. I'm not sure why your log is not showing the message.

installing 9.6 on freebsd7 configure problems

Hi: I'm trying to install BIND 9.6.0 from source but am having problems with the configure statement. I tried: ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc/namedb --mandir=/usr/share/man \ --localstatedir=/var --disable-threads --with-openssl=/usr followed by "make && make install" and 9.6 wa

Was BIND 9.4.3 announced on bind-announce / bind-users ?

I am somewhat embarrassed to find myself unaware that BIND 9.4.3 was (apparently) released on 19 November, superceding 9.4.3rc1 from 5 November. Unless I have done something very strange to my mail folders, I never received the usual notification from ISC. Was this just me, or was there a more ge

Re: installing 9.6 on freebsd7 configure problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 FYI, I have a repo-copy request in to portmgr so that I can add the bind96 port, but given the holidays they are a bit backed up (understandable). You can get a copy of what will be the port at: http://dougbarton.us/Downloads/bind96-freebsd-port.

Re: openssl alert when 9.8i installed?

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, aklist wrote: > Hi All: I downloaded 9.6.0 and ran > > ./configure --with-openssl > > and received the warning that I should have 9.8d or better installed. I went > ahead and updated to 9.8i and confirmed that it was running, but when I run > configure I still get the error?

Re: installing 9.6 on freebsd7 configure problems

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, aklist wrote: > Hi: I'm trying to install BIND 9.6.0 from source but am having problems with > the configure statement. I tried: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc/namedb --mandir=/usr/share/man \ > --localstatedir=/var --disable-threads --with-openssl=/usr > >

Re: Was BIND 9.4.3 announced on bind-announce / bind-users ?

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Chris Thompson wrote: > I am somewhat embarrassed to find myself unaware that BIND 9.4.3 was > (apparently) released on 19 November, superceding 9.4.3rc1 from 5 November. > > Unless I have done something very strange to my mail folders, I never > received the usual notificatio

Re: Was BIND 9.4.3 announced on bind-announce / bind-users ?

Chris Thompson asked in Subject: > Was BIND 9.4.3 announced on bind-announce / bind-users ? I have received the announcement on >> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:54:40 +1100 via >> To: bind-annou...@isc.org mailing list. You can read the original at URL

Fresh (non cached) dig

For all my attempts to read the manual on DIG I can't find a way to do something really simple. Is there a way to dig a domain name so even if the results are in cache, it will ignore these and re-read them? It's really from a testing perspective I'm looking at this. I can mash the keyboard eac

Re: Fresh (non cached) dig

If you're referring to your local system's cache, you can bypass this by specifying a DNS server for dig to query. use @dns.server.domain or @4.2.2.2(for example) for this. If you're referring to the cache on the server you're trying to query, sorry, that's beyond your control, unless you have roo