Re: Help tracing out a strange lookup case

2008-12-27 Thread Stephen Ward
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:18:08 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > This is *exactly* why there is a rule in RFC 1034 prohibiting > the use of CNAME with anything else. This is also why named enforces > the rule. The operators of share-ideas.com are in violation of this > rule and thei

Re: Help tracing out a strange lookup case

2008-12-27 Thread Barry Margolin
In article , Stephen Ward wrote: > I get this clue myself: > > ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available No, that's unrelated, because you're not a customer of the ISP he was using. The problem, as the previous poster said, is that the domain has both a CNAME and A record for crm.sh

validator bug?

2008-12-27 Thread Hanspeter Spalinger
Hi, today my bind crashed with the following in my log files: Dec 27 19:12:49 localhost named[9294]: not insecure resolving 'tracker.piecesnbits.net.dlv.isc.org/DLV/IN': [SCRUBBED IP OF MY ISP_DNS]#53 Dec 27 19:13:03 localhost named[9294]: validator.c:2762: REQUIRE(type != 0) failed Dec 27 19:13:

Re: validator bug?

2008-12-27 Thread Evan Hunt
> Dec 27 19:12:49 localhost named[9294]: not insecure resolving > 'tracker.piecesnbits.net.dlv.isc.org/DLV/IN': [SCRUBBED IP OF MY ISP_DNS]#53 > Dec 27 19:13:03 localhost named[9294]: validator.c:2762: REQUIRE(type != > 0) failed > Dec 27 19:13:03 localhost named[9294]: exiting (due to assertion fa